Five Nights At Freddy’s 2 – Review

Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 44 minutes, Director – Emma Tammi

A year after the events at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza the animatronics are back, upgraded and out for revenge on the adults of the nearby town, under the control of a force trapped in the original restaurant.

After almost immediate box office success a sequel to 2023’s Five Nights At Freddy’s was announced. Along with it mention that the follow-up would lean into the horror more, after responses to the first film said that it needed to be scarier. Indeed, whilst still maintaining a PG-13 rating in the US and a fitting 15 in the UK, it seems that these calls have been listened to as the quickly-turned-around sequel puts more emphasis into the creeps and doesn’t get distracted with attempts at tonally conflicting laughs as with before – although there are a couple of good chuckles here and there.

A year on from the first five nights spent at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza now-11-year-old Abby (Piper Rubio) is missing her animatronic friends, eventually travelling back to the abandoned restaurant. However, when discovering the original location where the Freddy’s chain started she discovers upgraded animatronics which need her help to leave the building. However, once free there may be something more in the restaurant controlling them, seeking revenge on parents in the nearby town.


The force in question is the new arrival of the Marionette. A figure which the more we see of it manages to become creepier with how it attacks those who come near it. Uncovered by a group of young paranormal investigators, led by McKenna Grace, with Abby’s brother, and former night guard, Mike (Josh Hutcherson), alongside Elisabeth Lail’s Vanessa, uncovering the truth and trying to fight back, and protect the town. Inside the restaurant, where it seems that certain instances involving Hutcherson’s character behind a desk may be leaning more into the style of the games (of which I still know very little about), there’s a sense of sustained threat and tension that manages to leak slightly into the events outside Freddy Fazbear’s.

Things may be narratively tangled with one too many plot strands piled on top of each other, alongside the ending feeling a bit too brief as an effect of focusing more on building up an inevitable sequel, but there’s still light amusement to be found in the events at hand. Events which while busy I’d be lying if I said they didn’t go by quickly, and in large part that’s likely down to the consistency in tone throughout. Upping the creepiness and making sure to draw it out in a couple of key scenes that play into the mechanics (not quite literally) of the animatronics the most. We see old iterations of the figures of Freddy, Bonnie, Foxy and Chica – worn out, torn apart and with multiple rows of teeth – they’re only lightly seen, but there’s something quite effective about them when they’re used to jump up in the darkness of office confines.

The end result of this sequel may not be perfect, especially as it almost seems to turn into a bridge film to an as-yet-unannounced third instalment, but it certainly shows the creatives (namely director Emma Tammi and writer Scott Cawthon – taking sole credit for the screenplay this time) have listened to the responses from last time and actually taken them on board. And it makes for a pacier, creepier time that leans into the antagonistic side of the animatronics, and the forces behind them, by maintaining the threat at hand, and slightly stretching that PG-13 limit.

While still narratively busy, Five Nights At Freddy’s 2 is a step up from the previous entry, focusing on the stretches of tension and creepiness thanks to a more consistent tone throughout, even as it starts to focus more on the next instalment rather than its own plot.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

LFF 2025: La Grazia – Review

Release Date – 20th March 2026, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 2 hours 11 minutes, Director – Paolo Sorrentino

President Mariano De Santis’ (Toni Servillo) term is coming to an end. As he looks back on his career he worries about life, legacy, party and people.

“Your term is about to come to an end, Dad. When will you ever decide anything?” Mariano De Santis’ (Toni Servillo) term as Italian President has been one of safety. Boring and unswayed from the party line, which has made most of his decisions, for years his unknown-to-him nickname has been Reinforced Concrete. Never leaning towards anything that might be deemed controversial or divisive. Documents which would legalise euthanasia in the country sit on his desk throughout the film, his mind split with the personal and political ‘what if’s’ whenever he looks at them.

Legacy is at the core of La Grazia. Like age has done for De Santis the feeling on looking back on life and a career in old age creeps up on the film. As the final days of the latter approach for the central character Servillo’s performance becomes more reflective and somewhat downcast, especially in the wake of the conflictions at play. Will his legacy be defined by his party or what he’s done for the people of the country that voted him in, and is doing something for the people just to boost his image really doing something for the people?


As such themes are explored the satirical humour throughout starts to diminish. In the fist half the tone of La Grazia is somewhat unexpectedly funny. There are a number of chuckles to be found as the grandness of the presidency is contrasted with the tightly-kept and bland form of De Santis, although the character himself isn’t bland to the viewer. You can see the thoughts and conflictions flip-flopping through his mind at each moment, even when confronted with the prospect that his late wife cheated on him many years before, with him trying to find out with whom of his friends, and staff.

La Grazia translates to ‘grace’ and in many ways the film is about trying to achieve that. As an image seen by others, as a way of feeling or coming to terms with the past and indeed feeling about oneself and decisions. Writer-director Paolo Sorrentino deals with a number of these ideas gracefully, with the help of Servillo’s strong central performance which much of the film revolves around.

The weight, like the decisions of De Santis, is on his shoulders and he carries it successfully. A tale of ageing and final days, confronting and doing the right thing as part of them, and simply making your own decisions without the burden of thought for critical responses or the party. A number of these are subtly dealt with and work hand-in-hand with the ideas at the heart of the film which itself is an amusing and well-balanced piece of work.

Toni Servillo brilliantly carries La Grazia’s themes of ageing, legacy and final days through the chuckles of the first half and the more solemn second. Thematically mirroring the changing mindset of the central figure.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2025: If I Had Legs I’d Kick You – Review

Release Date – 20th February 2026, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 1 hour 53 minutes, Director – Mary Bronstein

Linda (Rose Byrne) is struggling to stay afloat, looking after her sick daughter (Delaney Quinn) as their home falls apart, while her therapist (Conan O’Brien) doesn’t seem to take her seriously.

Linda is dead behind the eyes. It’s a look that Rose Byrne has mastered in If I Had Legs I’d Kick You. Hers is a performance that, alongside the film as a whole, understands the feeling of being depressed and tired and empty. The world is piling down on her and she’s struggling to stay afloat. The posters in her office, where she works as a therapist, reading “it always seems impossible until it’s done.” seem desperately unencouraging.

For Linda, ‘it’ relates to her whole life falling apart – much like her home. The ceiling of one of the rooms in her apartment has fallen in causing the place to flood, moving out until it’s fixed, a time that appears to be constantly pushed, into a nearby motel. With her husband (Christian Slater) away, she’s left to look after her young, ill daughter (Delaney Quinn – never properly seen, only heard). As she tells her own therapist (a withering, dramatic turn from Conan O’Brien) about how everything seems to be closing in on her, barely staying afloat, she’s met with an unsympathetic response.


The pressure at hand, and Linda’s increasing lack of energy to deal with things as she’s pushed and pulled in multiple directions, leads to a number of difficult-to-watch scenes. Whether missing meetings at medical centres or one instance where she’s talking to a client of hers over the phone unease creeps in, further fuelling the breakdown that appears to be central to the film. There’s an underlying fear and tension to almost everything that happens once the elements are set up, even hidden behind the dark humour which raises an occasional scattered chuckle. This mixture of tones, all accompanying the psychological drama at hand, caught by Byrne’s increasingly exasperated performance – unquestionably deserving of the awards attention that’s been quietly growing over the last few weeks.

“I’ll be better, I promise I can be better” she tells herself as much as anyone else. She wants to try and wants to be better, but at the same time needs some form of break and escape. Just a moment to lie down. However, these can create further problems down the line. Writer-director Mary Bronstein’s screenplay could enter into territory similar to The Lost Daughter, or the anxiety of Uncut Gems, but successfully avoids it by focusing on the constantly tired yet trying attitude that Linda has, and not involving historical regret.

A state that’s captured in the overall tone and style of the film and grows the tension at hand. The worry for other characters who trust in Linda, partly stemmed through her own want to help. And yet, the world and everything that could possibly cause further anxiety and worry continues to beat down. Everything leads to more trouble and mental exhaustion with little help or listening ears. This is a film about tiredness and emptiness that’s got plenty of weighty spark in its ideas.

Perfectly capturing a tired depression, Rose Byrne commands If I Had Legs I’d Kick You as her character struggles to stay afloat in a film that manages to do so amongst a lot of tense worry from multiple angles.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2025: Redoubt- Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 1 hour 25 minutes, Director – John Skoog

The peak of the Cold War, farmer Karl-Göran (Denis Lavant) sets to work building a protective shelter for him and the nearby village. However, the more it grows the more isolated and ridiculed he becomes.

The Cold War creates two worlds in Redoubt. That of fear faced by farmer Karl-Göran (Denis Lavant) as he sets about creating a shelter for himself, and that of everyday life for the nearby village, who with every day that passes without a nuclear strike he expands his build to include as many of as possible. The local children run through the muddy fields that he carries scraps of wood, metal and tires through telling him how they’re gathering materials for their own fort. It’s these children who take the most interest in Karl and his efforts, and he seems to spend more time with them than anyone else in the unwelcoming landscape – captured in dark greys of black and white – before isolating himself more and more as his shelter expands.

Lavant’s performance is a very quiet one. The more isolated his character becomes the greater the weight he appears to carry is, his worry of nuclear war growing with each day – leading to further isolation as the young men in the village ridicule him, especially when the shelter becomes his home. It’s as these comments start to come into play, almost around halfway through the film, that Redoubt starts to gain more substance and we find more of an emotional connection with Karl, alongside a growing fascination with the shifting forces that are propelling him.

Co-writer (alongside Kettil Kasan) and director John Skoog maintains a restrained sound and image to the film. Karl’s shelter gradually becomes less a fort as the children view it and more an impenetrable fortress, as if designed to keep the rest of the world out as he still builds it for that world. Housing himself in cold and darkness so no radiation can get him when the, to him, inevitable arrives. It takes some time for things to get going as the slow pacing, and minimal dialogue, establish the relationships at play. And while it’s initially engaging to simply see the construction happening, albeit it not with the overhanging feeling of threat or dread which doesn’t appear to be a major factor of the film as a whole, it takes some time to properly form an emotional connection, despite Lavant’s stone-faced performance.

Without an overhanging dread, it takes some time to form an emotional connection with Denis Lavant’s quietly-performed, weight-carrying character. But, as we see more of those around him, and the well-captured build and landscape grow, there’s a connecting intrigue in just how things will develop.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Eternity – Review

Release Date – 5th December 2025, Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 54 minutes, Director – David Freyne

Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) dies and arrives at The Junction, where she has a week to decide where to spend eternity, and whether to spend it with decades-long husband Larry (Miles Teller) or first husband Luke (Callum Turner) who died young and has been waiting those decades.

A mark that can cringe-inducingly age a film even before release is the dialogue trying to replicate the way the screenwriters believe young people speak. Throwing in forced, outdated slang without a full grasp on what any of it means – with even the audience in the same pool knowing that the thrown-in phrases don’t quite fit in in the way used. The same can be said for older characters, if not written as being comedically out-of-touch and improperly using not-quite-modern slang.

Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) and Larry (Miles Teller) have passed away within a week of each other. They arrive at The Junction, a 70’s-style lobby full of apartment towers and stalls promoting different afterlives, and are given a week to decide where to spend eternity. The catch being they aren’t allowed to leave where they choose once decided, or else they’re thrown into ‘The Void’. The pair appear as they were when happiest in life, yet still speak like the elder versions of themselves we see in the opening scene (played by Betty Buckley and Barry Primus). Patrick Cunnane and director David Freyne’s screenplay, albeit with one or two slight bumps, really captures something in the way the characters speak and come across as characters who indeed spent decades on Earth, especially together, while have a long-burning frustration at the situation they find themselves in.


A situation largely caused by the arrival of Joan’s first husband, Luke (Callum Turner), who died in the Korean War – Turner has a natural look about him that would fit right into the 40s and 50s – and has been waiting 67 years for Joan to arrive. Having maintained something of a youthful spirit as the years have weathered away at him inside if not entirely outside. Therefore, Joan is tasked with decide which husband she wants to spend eternity with while Larry and Luke bicker and feud with each other over her affection. Largely observed by Afterlife Coordinators Da’Vine Joy Randolph and John Early; both bringing about a number of laughs throughout, in addition to the array of worlds available – from Beach World and Mountain World to Mall World and the eternally full Man Free World, with Studio 54 and 1930s German club (now with 100% less Nazis) themes, too.

For the most part Eternity manages to breeze along thanks to how invested it is in the central dilemma facing Joan. You can almost see Olsen coming apart with the push and pull she finds herself trapped between. With the central cast all giving strong performances, particularly Teller whose mannerisms show an inner conflict and doubt at each and every turn, it’s easy to engage with the central question as the fight to spend eternity with her plays out. It does lead to an overly busy final 30 minutes as the question truly dominates everything and starts to lean into a tangle of pros, cons, uncertainty and fear of regret for all involved. As we start to see more of the different worlds at hand, and the lives of the three when they were alive, the run-time starts to be felt.

Yet, there are still a good number of chuckles to be found and engagement in the ways in which the afterlife at hand works. It helps that for the most part the film plays into the lightness and humour and doesn’t feel as if it’s asking big existential questions – Larry states a good way through that he hasn’t even pondered the meaning of life once since he died. Such points are more present in the third act where you can feel the weight of them playing into the pushed run-time and overall tone. But, largely thanks to the performances and the focus on the nature of the dialogue – the screenplay is one aspect of Eternity that really doesn’t seem to have gotten the commendations that it deserves – the film keeps its head above water as we follow the old souls in the effectively compacted confines of The Junction.

There’s effective detail in the dialogue and performances of Eternity which capture the old souls at the heart of it. With enough laughs to see it through its heavier set of conflictions there’s an engaging push to the core question throughout and the design of the world in which everything takes place.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2025: The Testament Of Ann Lee – Review

Release Date – 20th February 2026, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 2 hours 15 minutes, Director – Mona Fastvold

The 18th Century, after a life of tragedy Ann Lee (Amanda Seyfried) spreads her religious Shaker movement from England to America, becoming a figurehead for those who follow, and threaten, her.

The Testament Of Ann Lee is a frustratingly restless film. The Shaker movement the titular character (played by Amanda Seyfried) spreads from the streets of Manchester to its own, God-directed land in pre-revolution America sees people overcome by God’s power and start shaking, convulsing in song and dance. Yet, even their jerkily waving movements feel more calm than the film they feature in. One which bursts into snippets of songs so brief that it feels as if this apparent musical has no proper musical numbers; making Joker 2 look like a wall-to-wall song-and-dance bash.

The longest track repeats the phrase “I love mother” over and over again, after having followed a conversation about false gods. The more it went on I found myself genuinely wondering if it was going to turn out that Ann Lee was a major cult leader. The more the film revolves around her and she becomes a noted leader – multiple synopses for the film have stated that her followers view her as a female incarnation of Christ – the more cultlike it all becomes, and I don’t entirely think that’s the intention. The voiceover throughout (courtesy of Thomasin McKenzie, who appears later in the film) is telling a grand, historical story, even if it occasionally sounds like it’s coming from Philomena Cunk; “they went in search of a wide avenue called Broad Street.”


It’s one of a couple of unintentionally humorous moments in the film, the other being an extended sequence which sees characters trying to find where to build the Shaker town – “paradise through toil and chastity” – guided by an index finger seemingly moved by God. But, aside from Mr Hucknall’s magic finger (gifted unto him by God) there’s little levity throughout this film – co-written by Brutalist writers Mona Fastvold (who also directs) and Brady Corbet, who both have slight musical experience having worked on 2018’s Vox Lux. The Testament Of Ann Lee simply falls flat and feels like a very slow trudge through each event. No matter how much is going on it all simply feels boring.

After being told about a series of births and subsequent bereavements we see a near-montage of this panning out, making it clear that this is going to be a downbeat film. Instances relating to Ann’s marriage to Christopher Abbott’s Abraham and abuse faced come into play, although feel somewhat brief when they are amongst everything else that’s thrown towards the titular character – who Seyfried does her best to keep determined and, more importantly, afloat for the sake of the film. With just how much is going on and what’s also thrown at the audience it’s difficult to work out who this film is for. It feels confused and directionless and rather than targeting a lot of people at once it doesn’t quite feel as if its targeting anyone.

The whole thing is all rather bland and dour. With the titular character seemingly coming out of it through how people seem to have viewed her rather than as herself, being caught up in the perfect image created by the Shaker following that we see grow over the long run-time. The Testament Of Ann Lee eventually feels less like Ann Lee’s personal testament and more it told through the eyes of the devout Shakers, meaning that a lot eventually gets caught in what’s attempted to be shown and in the end perhaps has the opposite depiction and impact. Either way, it all feels as cut up and conflicting as the bursts of song and the fact that this seems to want to be a musical.

Much like the bursts of song throughout, The Testament Of Ann Lee feels jumbled and detached. A long, boring slog where the Shakers feel increasingly cult-like it’s very difficult to know who this is really for.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

LFF 2025: The President’s Cake – Review

Release Date – 13th February 2026, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 1 hour 45 minutes, Director – Hasan Hadi

90s Iraq, nine-year-old Lamia (Baneen Ahmad Nayyef) is tasked with making a cake for her school to celebrate Saddam Hussein’s birthday, or her family will face punishment. However, ingredients aren’t cheap, or easy to come by.

Saddam Hussein’s face looms over The President’s Cake. If not as a picture on a wall in every room of every building it’s as a mural spread across a wall. A reminder of the threat faced by nine-year-old Lamia (Baneen Ahmad Nayyef) if she fails to make a cake for her school to celebrate Saddam Hussein’s birthday. After her name has been pulled out of a hat the class are reminded of what happened to the kid who failed to bring one of the required gifts the year before – in monotone unison they say that he and his family were dragged to death.

The items to make the cake may be few but they’re also scarce, and expensive. Lamia lives with her grandmother (Waheed Thabet Khreibat) who already struggles to afford to feed the pair of them – leading to a particularly crushing set of circumstances which separates the pair of them part way through – as Lamia and schoolfriend Saeed (Sajad Mohamad Qasem) filter through the nearby markets to her home; a one-room hut floating in the middle of the river, fear grows and grows.


As the characters go from place to place it would be so easy for the events to become farcical. The base narrative – finding the ingredients to make a cake for Saddam Hussein’s birthday – sound as if they could come from a comedy, until the reminder that death is the consequence of failing to do so. But, while there are some occasionally funny moments which maintain the consistent movement of the drama The President’s Cake is a largely simple story that’s told with a good deal of emotion, largely because of what’s contextually playing out in the background. Particularly conveyed in a fantastic central child performance from Nayyef who gets right to the heart of a child aware of the tragedy around her, and that she could face. Facing disgruntled, unrelenting shopkeepers and risky heists, not to mention a missing chicken. Often holding on to the connection she has with her grandmother, and looking after her as much as she’s looked after.

Misfortune rears its head more and more, although the film is more emotionally gripping than bleak. Heartfelt questions met with silence have a particularly striking effect, we feel the tension and disappointment faced by Lamia throughout. We worry and fear for her. The way in which I found myself engaging with the film was quiet yet led to a powerful effect from what I was seeing. Again, much of which coming from the simple context in the events which seamlessly lead from one to the other, avoiding a chaptered feel.

Even in the closing stages the overriding feeling of The President’s Cake is one of emotional tension. Wonderfully created by the cast, particularly the lead, and writer-director Hasan Hadi who quietly and empathetically looks at the poverty and unease struck into struggling 90s Iraq. All with the overhanging threat of death and loss, which takes on different meanings in the separations of the film, while the president gets his cake.

Avoiding farce but still raising some laughs, The President’s Cake is a quietly engaging and emotionally striking film; holding worry, fear and tension throughout the simple yet impactful narrative. All brilliantly captured in the central child performance and reminders of the looming contextual threat.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2025: 100 Nights Of Hero – Review

Release Date – 6th February 2026, Cert – TBC, Run-time – 1 hour 30 minutes, Director – Julia Jackman

Noblewoman Cherry (Maika Monroe) is given 101 days to conceive a child, however her husband (Amir El-Masry) keeps rejecting her, with friend Manfred (Nicholas Galitzine) betting that he can seduce her in that time. But, could the stories of maid Hero (Emma Corrin) grow a strength and independence in Cherry?

100 Nights Of Hero is a family fantasy for grown-ups that kids can watch. Throughout the sets, costumes and humour consistently reminded me of The Princess Bride as Emma Corrin’s Hero rolls her eyes at the world and characters around her, much of which she largely sidesteps as she calmly and confidently continues forward with her plan, reacting in the moment seems to be all part of it.

Nicholas Galitzine’s Manfred has 100-days to seduce noblewoman Cherry (Maika Monroe) – “beautiful, obedient, good at chess and falconry.” Her husband Jerome (Amir El-Masry) has been given 101 to conceive a child with her, and so flees ‘on business’ for 100, after having turned her down every night in the months beforehand, taking Manfred’s bet that he can seduce her. However, Hero starts to piece things together and for many nights, and days, tells stories of women telling and discovering stories, against the rule of the men around them, and the strength and confidence that comes with them. Perhaps inspiring something within Cherry.


But, Manfred isn’t going to back down quietly, adamant to show how much of a man he is – the kind who gets up each morning, goes for a run, kills a deer and drags it back; abs covered in sweat and blood) all as part of a rugged routine. However, Cherry often seems to be talking and listening to Hero, undistracted by Manfred’s often arrogant attempts at seduction. While bringing in the aforementioned thoughts of The Princess Bride such moments, and indeed the stories that are told by Hero, have the feeling of a children’s fantasy storybook having been opened up. The film itself, written and directed by Julia Jackman, is based on the graphic novel of the same name by Isabel Greenberg.

This is a fantasy that’s aware of its fantasy elements and has fun with them, bringing in some self-aware humour which is captured in Corrin’s reactions to the world around their character, often acting as our lens into the upfront events, and especially those that Hero tells of in her stories. There’s plenty of humour to be found throughout, including a number of laugh-out-loud moments in running jokes, such as the masked guards in the expansive home who feel like they’ve been pulled from 2015’s Bill. There’s a silliness to certain elements, those which are viewed as particularly ridiculous in how forceful they are in putting across a persona, or simply being brought down a peg, by the titular character, but Jackman never makes the film as a whole feel silly.

Hero’s stories start to, very gradually, light something within Cherry. And their relationship starts to be looked at more as the tally of days passed sprawls more across the screen as the return of Jerome nears. It might take some time for these elements to come together and properly click among what else the film is exploring, particularly in terms of tone which you can feel the more serious moments for the characters trying their best not to rub up or clash against, but it’s not enough to diminish the entertainment factor. Much of which is brought about by the combined design, style and humour of this storybook family fantasy.

A grown-up fantasy that still works for kids, 100 Nights Of Hero has plenty of Princess Bride-esque humour to see it through while it builds up the more serious character beats in its enjoyable, frequently funny storybook world.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Zootropolis 2 – Review

Cert – PG, Run-time – 1 hour 48 minutes, Directors – Jared Bush, Byron Howard

Reptiles haven’t been seen in Zootropolis for 100 years, that is until one (Key Huy Quan) returns to steal the original plans for the city – could it lead officers Judy Hopps (Ginnifer Goodwin) and Nick Wilde (Jason Bateman) to once again put aside their differences and uncover a takeover plot?

There are many wonderful puns throughout Zootropolis 2. Writer Jared Bush, and the team of animators bringing the world to life, less throws them in and more commits to them. From a brief exhale of amusement to genuine laugh-out-loud bits of wordplay – a reference to a “vindow viper” is a particular highlight – they are very much a part of the world rather than just small gags in themselves. Yet, it’s the world as a whole that perhaps has the most striking effect in this sequel.

The titular city, with all its different segments providing suitable climates for all kinds of animals, courtesy of what are known as ‘weather walls’, is a true visual feast and provides plenty of fun in the details on display – it could well make a great location for an open-world video game. Perhaps none more so than the gag-packed watery landscape of Marsh Market where a good deal of plot development occurs. Officers Judy Hopps (Ginnifer Goodwin) and Nick Wilde (Jason Bateman) are only one week post their saving the city and it seems they may have to do so again when snakes return (in the form of Ke Huy Quan’s Gary). Reptiles haven’t been seen in Zootropolis in its almost 100-year history, but Gary claims that a book with plans for the weather walls and city as a whole could provide proof that could allow his family back, and perhaps uncover a takeover plot that’s been unfolding for decades.


While likable and moving things along at a consistent pace the plot certainly feels familiar, and isn’t quite as strong as in the first Oscar-winning outing to Zootropolis nine years ago, it’s the city itself that provides much of the engagement, and indeed movement. Whether through water-slide like transport systems, racing through the streets of the main city or inside the weather walls there’s a constant energy to the animation and look of what’s happening on screen. For all the praise of Moana and Frozen, and even Wreck-It-Ralph’s various video game landscapes (I would also personally mention the creativity of the truly underrated Strange World), Zootropolis may be Disney’s best, most entertaining and immersive, world of their current era).

Nick and Judy once again make for an energetic double act, bouncing off each other with their very different approaches to things – the fox much more cynical and wisecracking than the positive, can-do attitude rabbit. Their differences once again come up as a point that could trouble their partnership – which the film plays as purely a friendship, despite the internet’s (and I believe to some extent creatives’) views otherwise. Some such elements may come as part of the more familiar, and slightly weaker, narrative beats but there are others, like moments that look at the pair’s tight bond which have a genuine heartfelt feel to them.

Much like Zootropolis 2, their relationship may have some bumps, but they see it through by taking the different environments of the expansive city in their stride. From the tundra (and its excellent reference to The Shining) to the desert, and the wetlands in-between, there’s plenty to enjoy about the locations and life of the city; also glimpsed in the fun supporting characters, featuring some welcome returning faces. There’s a love for the world and the characters that live in it, and help make it what it is, and that’s what sees it through. Shakira returns as the city’s pop star Gazelle, telling us in the film’s original song, Zoo, that “concrete jungle life is sometimes a mad place” and Bush, co-director Byron Howard and the whole team of animators and artists fully embrace this with plenty of love.

The narrative may not be as strong, but the detail and love that goes into one of Disney’s most immersive worlds sees Zootropolis 2 comfortably through, alongside a cast of entertaining characters and wonderful puns, bringing about plenty of chuckles.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2025: Nouvelle Vague – Review

Release Date – 30th January 2026, Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 46 minutes, Director – Richard Linklater

Jean-Luc Godard (Guillaume Marbeck) turns his hand from film criticism to filmmaking, however it seems everyone else involved in the largely improvised production of Breathless has no clue what he’s trying to do.

Nouvelle Vague is undoubtedly catering to a rather niche audience, those interested in the production of Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless, and the birth of the French New Wave. It would be easy to hear the base of the film and brand it as pretentious, and the opening stages could easily come across that way, however as production gets underway what we’re treated to is The Disaster Artist in ’60’s France.

Godard (Guillaume Marbeck) – whose dialogue largely consists of quotes, in a film full of great ones – sets out with the belief that “the best way to criticise a film is to make one,” trading in his critic role at Cahiers du Cinéma to become director. However, with little in the way of script it seems he’s making everything up on the spot, cancelling days of shooting in the morning because ideas haven’t come together. It comes at the frustration of cast, crew and producers who often find themselves standing around with nothing to do, or no clue as to what they’re meant to do. “This is utter madness, and it’s only the beginning” observes one crewmember before the real chaos has been unearthed.


Instead of pretentiousness the screenplay by Holly Gent and Vincent Palmo (translated by Michèle Halberstadt and Laetitia Masson) focuses on lightness and manages to bring that out in the humour throughout the film. Making for entertainment whether you have or haven’t seen the film. When watching the film I knew nothing about it going in, and hadn’t seen Breathless. While for those who have seen the film there may be an amusing insight, particularly when it comes to famous shots and sequences, those unaware of the film won’t find themselves shut out. Even with all the shots and elements the film tries to cover, which eventually cause it to feel a little on the long side.

Yet, with the humorous angle that the screenwriters and director Richard Linklater create, alongside the cast, there’s an easily disarming tone to the whole thing. One that welcomes all viewers in, establishing early on a film that works well with an audience, for a likable and smoothly entertaining time. Simply watching the production unfold, and it manages to make something out of that without feeling thinly spread. Bringing you in to the filmmaking process, not overly trying to look into Godard’s mind or methods and instead placing us in the shoes of everyone around him as a much-loved slice of French New Wave is pieced together before, and in some ways, with them and the audience. And somehow, like with Breathless, Nouvelle Vague manages to pull it off.

A consistently amusing look at the improvised production of Breathless, there’s no pretentiousness about Nouvelle Vague as it creates a humorous and entertaining time for both those aware and unaware of the film. It’s a real pleasant surprise, The Disaster Artist but with knowledge and love that the film turns out a classic of its kind.

Rating: 4 out of 5.