PIFF 2022: Nightshades – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 21 minutes, Director – Sophie Tavert Macian

When three friends (Lorine Wolff, Julie Tavert, Malina Ioana-Ferrante) reunite in the middle of a pandemic to mourn the loss of one of their aunts, things begin to turn sinister as the experiment with the occult.

There’s an interesting nature to the way in which writer-director Sophie Tavert Macian’s Nightshades plays with its elements of ambiguity. What starts out as “a girls’ weekend, just between us. And some ghosts” begins to delve into seriousness as the occult and supernatural are meddled with. It’s never made clear whether the central trio are witches themselves; the rituals which they appear to be performing could be for a bit of fun, yet there’s always a layer of seriousness to them with the belief that they could help communicate with the recently passed aunt of one of them, Mili (Lorine Wolff).

Yet, seriousness is where the film begins to lean in its second half as the presence of Patrick (Gérald Robert-Tissot) appears in the small house which the three women (also including Julie Tavert’s Mado and Malina Ioana-Ferrante’s Baza) are staying. Patrick turning up certainly acts as a turning point for the film as the tone changes, and indeed a shift appears to take place across the piece as a whole. He’s a largely unexplained figure who poses both a sinister nature and potential familiarity to the three. Further creating the sense of ambiguity, perhaps the mystical powers and rituals are real and have caused an effect.


While the second half of the short 81 minute run-time may feel different to what has come beforehand it still generally works and keeps you engaged. It helps that the film as a whole appears to have a relatively simplistic structure and nature. Much of the first half appears to be build up, the three reconnecting after a long period spent in lockdown in various struggling, distant or non-existent, relationships, trying to rediscover their connection – “where are the b!tches I spoke to over lockdown?” one of them asks relatively early in the film as the group explores the quiet town around them, a slightly meandering set of moments which aren’t always the most connecting. With this being the case it means that, while still fairly simplistic, the final 15 minutes – where most of the (dramatic) action takes place things do seem to once again slightly shift. They work, although waver when it comes to pairing up with what has come beforehand over the course of the narrative.

Certainly the short run-time appears to stem from the fairly stripped back nature that Nightshades holds – which is no bad thing. It does mean that some of the points in the build up to the core turnaround can begin to feel slightly stretched out, particularly when the tonal shift arrives and things begin to spin for the well-performed central trio. The ambiguity of some moments helps to keep the viewer engaged in the film, particularly when it comes to whether there are actually witch-related powers being used, or it’s a fantasy in the minds of the characters to cope with grief, or a point of tradition, etc. It’s one of the core points of interest within the film that helps to move it along and keep the viewer engaged, even during the shifts towards the end of the piece which while still working do feel of a slightly different film. However, things generally work with an engaging and amusing nature consistently placing the three central friends and their own actions and thoughts at the centre of the film, rarely distracting from that and keeping some form of connection thanks to it.

While it might experience some tonal shifts, particularly in the final 15 minutes, they generally work for Nightshades as, especially once the relatively simple narrative turns around, it consistently places the three central friends, and occasionally their ambiguous witch-like powers, at the centre of the film.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness – Review

Cert – 12, Run-time – 2 hours 6 minutes, Director – Sam Raimi

After encountering a young girl (Xochitl Gomez) who can travel across the multiverse, Dr Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) finds himself travelling through various universes to stop the Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) from destroying them.

If Spider-Man: No Way Home was the ignition for the latest set of expansions within the Marvel Cinematic Universe then there’s no denying that Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness is the explosion that will lead to the effect. As the title, and previous films, would suggest this sees Benedict Cumberbatch’s spellcasting hero travelling across the ranges of the multiverse as he attempts to protect the universe-jumping America Chavez (Xochitl Gomez) from capture. However, hunting her is the darkening force of the Scarlet Witch, AKA Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen). Her power travels across the various different universes – most of which are explored in a quick sequence, which does leave you wanting to spend more time in the more visually amusing concepts – and threatens to destroy them, with the chance of them beginning to somehow crash into each other.

While not the villainous leading figure of the piece, in the way that Thanos was in Avengers: Infinity War, Wanda certainly gets a fair deal of screen-time throughout this film. It likely comes as an effect of everything that has been built up to for her so far within the MCU, and in some ways this brings a slight level of confliction to the character. She’s being posed as the antagonistic figure of the piece, however with everything that has come beforehand in mind there are, of course, sympathetic leanings which occasionally conflict or get in the way with the moments that want to solely pose her as a villainous threat consumed by her own pain, and interactions with dark forces that have begun to consumer her. Such dark forces are played with throughout the film, particularly as an element for the base of the narrative, and certainly bring about a slight Sam Raimi style, as the director returns to that role on the big screen for the first time in nearly ten years.

Multiverse Of Madness comes with many of the distinct Raimi tropes, including an excellent Bruce Campbell cameo. It’s unmistakeably been directed by him. This helps lean into one or two of the more horror related elements as well. While not a horror film itself there are hints and tones of the genre dotted here and there throughout the film, particularly the more fluid second half, which act as a point of interest, even if you do wish they were more up front and slightly bolder. You can occasionally feel the Marvel reins being pulled in during such moments. Perhaps for now it’s the studio further experimenting with genres in their films, or what they can play with in the future when it comes to the plans set out for their next phases – Kevin Feige has said he’s planning the next ten years for the studio.


If this film is a launching pad of sorts, or as mentioned earlier the explosion to lead to the effect, then it certainly feels like it at times. Much of the first half of the film feels very expositional and as if it’s simply acting as build-up to more things to come outside of itself. When working with the various different characters and the locations they find themselves in – alongside Strange, Chavez and Wanda we also spend some time with girl-that-got-away Christine (Rachel McAdams, with a bit more to do this time around) and legendary Sorcerer Supreme Wong (Benedict Wong) – there’s a lot of jumping back and forth, providing and eventually quite jumbled feel to things. It causes certain moments – including one particularly major sequence – to strike a wavering tone that feels almost uncertain of itself; is it supposed to be an intense piece of dramatic action or more along the lines of something in James Gunn’s The Suicide Squad?

Yet, much of this appears to arrive as the multiverse is still being explored in the first half of the film. Once things calm down, somewhat, and begin to focus more on the core targets of the film, instead of expanding certain elements and planting seeds for future films, there’s more to enjoy within the better flow that picks up. There’s more enjoyment to be found within certain scenes as there’s less jumping between characters and locations, particularly in the same sequence when we’ve had some longer moments just before. Generally as the film progresses and begins to become more concerned with its narrative and directly progressing things it finds itself working to a much stronger degree to when it moves from place to place in quick succession. There may still be some flaws present, but for the most part there’s an enjoyable nature to the slight madness that the multiverse has to offer, particularly when it comes to the spell-based action that’s on display. Further helped by the directorial style of Sam Raimi, even if some of his and screenwriter Michael Waldron’s ideas do occasionally feel reined in. As the film travels along its various courses things come together and begin to flow with more ease. Keeping you in place and making for a better, less chaotic, time within the apparent multiverse of madness.

While it might occasionally feel conflicted and reined in, particularly in the jumpy first half, there’s still a fair deal to like and enjoy about Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness. Using the spells and magic effectively in action sequences there’s gradually a better flow, and therefore sense of engagement, to things.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Father Stu – Review

Release Date – 13th May 2022, Cert – 15, Run-time – 2 hours 4 minutes, Director – Rosalind Ross

Boxer Stuart Long (Mark Wahlberg) turns his life to priesthood, after initially attending church in the hope of attracting the attention of prominent church figure Carmen (Teresa Ruiz).

When you think of a standard faith-based film you perhaps wouldn’t commonly think of putting Mark Wahlberg in the leading role, it also feels as if the original screenplay for Father Stu hadn’t overly thought of that either. As we follow Wahlberg playing real life pastor Stuart Long from his days a boxer through to finding faith the film weaves in and out of general faith-based feature conventions, mixed with the stylings of something made for Wahlberg to lead, although still not completely the kind of film you may commonly associate with him. When giving up on boxing, Stuart moves to California in the hope of getting into acting. However, when working at the meat counter in a supermarket his eye is caught by Carmen (Teresa Ruiz). On tracking her down to her church Stu takes it upon himself to put on the guise of loose faith to get closer to the devout figure he’s become attracted to, but gradually finds his own faith.

It takes a bit of time for this latter segment to happen, and as Stu and Carmen grow somewhat closer, although her somewhat reluctantly, the former’s actions begin to feel quite creepy and uncomfortable with just how far he goes to try and get a date with the unknown woman. Perhaps this isn’t helped by the fact that the character himself appears to change every couple of scenes to a slightly different personality style depending on what the focus of that particular moment is. As well as trying to get into this relationship and growing a connection with God he’s charting the course of a rough relationship with his cynical father (Mel Gibson) and the threat of a growing illness, which plays more of a part in the latter half of the piece.


Throughout much of this course the film appears uneven and unsure as to what it actually wants to be. At times the question comes to mind as to whether certain moments are meant to be funny, if the film is trying to be a comedy – if so, then it’s very rarely successful in raising chuckles. Yet, as it travels along its path and becomes more direct in its style and nature, focusing more on the drama and connection to religion within Stu’s life, things clear up somewhat. Yes, there may be elements of convention introduced, but the film becomes more watchable and slightly engaging for this. Feeling calmer and less imbalanced in both focus and style. It feels more alike to the kind of film we may have got if Wahlberg wasn’t in the lead – although it should be said that he gives a good performance in the central role – and the general tone was more along the lines of your standard faith-based film.

The overall piece does have a conflicting vein throughout it, particularly when it comes to what it wants to be and who the primary target market is. While this doesn’t completely disrupt the film it certainly causes a few stumbles every now and then, particularly in the crossing between the first and second half – when we begin to get certain shots which look like they could be part of a parody Christian music video, Wahlberg kissing rosary beads in thankfulness. There are undeniably some questionable moments within the tonal shifts and conflictions throughout the film as it tries to appeal to various different groups at once, and this occasionally causes the finished piece to feel uneven. However, as the second half arrives and the focus becomes more direct things even out and while more in the line of convention they feel more watchable due to being less busy in trying to appeal to a wide range of people, perhaps much like Stu himself inevitably becomes.

While conflicted as to its tone and style, trying to appeal to various different audiences, like the central character, Father Stu eventually calms down and finds a more direct path within the slightly faith-based leanings creating a more watchable piece of work.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: For The Love Of Noise – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 55 minutes, Director – Alan Cross

A look at Brighton’s experimental noise scene and how it has developed over the years.

It’s hard not to have your interest peaked when hearing band names such as Leopard Leg, Thee Bald Knobbers and Cementimental. More so when you hear of the kind of music which they produce. It’s less music and more noise – in fact, its more often referred to as noise than anything else. From experimenting with common instruments and vocals to simply smacking a the inside of a wheelie bin in a cluttered space Alan Moore’s documentary takes a look at the “sound collage” of the underground noise scene that’s been unfolding in Brighton for many years.

Throughout the film we see various talking heads of figures involved with the noise scene at some stage or another. Speaking about their passions and the creative freedom which they feel is provided to them by the performance spaces that they are offered. There are certainly plenty of oddities on display when it comes to the music, and there’s no denying that even if it isn’t something you’d indulge in yourself that there’s a point of interest to be found. Particularly as the various faces that pop up throughout the film discuss their own personal viewpoints on the scene and put on their own experimental displays. Much of this, admittedly, comes in the final 10-15 minutes, with the 40 or so minutes beforehand diving more into the love thatthose involved have for what they do, create and hear. “It’s not motivated by anything other than the need to create” is a point which echoes throughout the film, agreed upon by most of the talking heads in some way or another – all interviewed separately – as is most of what the film brings up.

Things don’t quite become repetitive within the film’s short run time, but the feeling does begin to arise and slightly settle in that many views on each topic are echoed and gone back to. Where the biggest point of interest lies is in the creative process for making the noise and music. What inspires people and their own interaction with the listener, and even their own stage persona (if they have one). It’s interesting to hear someone say of something such as this kind of music “it’s not comfort listening… You kind of have to meet your audience half way”. Phrases such as this manage to create more of a connection with the subject matter, and those who are discussing it. Showing more of the process and thought behind it rather than the effect that it can have and the connection that others already have with it.

It’s during such strands where the film is at its best. It certainly has a lot to get in in just 55 minutes, and it gives a good idea and flavour of the Brighton noise scene, but never feels as if it goes into anything in-depth. Even towards the end as the film explores influences and processes, etc – once you’re more engaged with the piece and have the understanding of what the noise scene is, especially for those coming into things completely new. And while it doesn’t bring the film down entirely or make it feel entirely made up of basics you do sometimes wish for something slightly more in-depth, or at least more time spent looking at the themes of the brief closing stages where the imagination and creativity that’s talked about so much in the majority of the film is truly on display.

There’s an engaging nature to the delve into creativity and inspirations within For The Love Of Noise, but it feels brief in comparison to the slightly echoing expressions of love for the noise scene beforehand.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Downton Abbey: A New Era – Review

Cert – PG, Run-time – 2 hours 5 minutes, Director – Simon Curtis

While Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) and the staff oversee a film shoot at Downton Abbey many of the other faces and residents travel to the south of France, to a villa mysteriously left to Dowager Countess Violet (Maggie Smith).

With such an extensive range of characters, both within and out of the wealthy Grantham/ Crawley family, you would expect a film adaptation of Downton Abbey to have a lot to cover within various different strands. However, when the first feature adaptation of the hit television series was released in 2019 it turned out to tell the story of the house preparing for the king and queen to come and stay generally rather well. At least that’s what it was for those who have never seen the series before. For those who had there were a great many elements to dive into and keep track of continuing from the show. Legacies, hidden romances, a secret gay relationship, marriages, illnesses and so much more. Meanwhile, the sequel feels both much lighter and somehow busier. While many of the staff in this apparent new era – it’s noted by Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) that the house wants to “enter the 1930s with out heads held high” – are dealing with a film shoot occurring within Downton, many of the key faces and residents are sailing down to the sunny landscapes of the south of France, to a villa mysteriously bequeathed to Dowager Countess Violet (Maggie Smith – the straight and sarcastic humorous highlight of the film) from a gentleman she had a one week romance with in the 1860s.

Certainly the latter element is along the lines of the more general British small-to-big screen adaptation in sending the characters on holiday, it also has the bigger displays of wealth and stiff-upper-lip manners that you would expect from a period drama such as this. Yet, there’s a fair deal of build up to get to this point, and indeed the filming. With so many characters there’s plenty of jumping back and forth from scene to scene of brief conversations in grand halls and stairwells. It’s frustrating that you can almost see and hear the joins between each scene, the director shouting ‘action’ and ‘cut’ at the start and end of each take as you can pretty much see the start and end of each scene, with very little to bridge them together. It all revolves around potential build up to the core two strands of the film, both generally unrelated, although this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, yet provides little to hook you in due to the somewhat lacklustre construction.


However, as the cameras start rolling in the Abbey and film stars begin to show up – primarily Dominic West’s Guy Dexter and Laura Haddock’s Myrna Dalgleish – things begin to properly move along. The production of The Gambler is halted, however, when the true threat of the talkies on the silent film industry is revealed. The sweeping effect of sound in film, which causes great agitation to director Jack Barber (Hugh Dancy), is certainly dealt with with a fair deal of obviousness and heavy-handedness, but, as with before, once the apparent build-up of another idea is out the way and production shifts to involve sound there’s some interest and engaging enough moments created in the narrative to somewhat bring you in. Certainly nothing overly challenging is produced, as is likely expected from a product such as Downton where half the film involves a number of characters having gone on ‘holiday’ to investigate the matriarch’s “mysterious past”. The revelations and conversations are somewhat thin, but do just about enough to move things along.

Much of this comes before the second half where amongst the progressions of the two core strands more is introduced. More to do with hidden relationships and returning loves, quiet illnesses, etc. Most of this content appears to be for those who have followed the series, especially when it becomes dominant in the lengthy final half hour of the film, where it feels like things are constantly coming to a close before something else needs to be wrapped up. It’s likely that this moment will appeal and engage the original TV audience more, especially with the followed threads being more in their knowledge, perhaps. Whereas for those coming to this afresh, or even just based off of the first film, it may likely seem quite drawn out, although there are still some amusing and engaging moments throughout to keep interest held – and things don’t quite dive back into the stop-start nature of the opening stages.

The overall feel of this apparent new era of Downton Abbey is that while the opening and closing stages lead to the 2 hour plus run-time being felt – although the closing stages do have more to be amused by – the mid-section helps it along with enough content and lightness to carry things through. It might not be the tightest of films, but thanks to some of the chuckles along the way, and a handful of points of interest to keep you engaged once things properly kick off this half-return to Downton is serviceable viewing for those who have never seen an episode of the series, and for the fans a likely enjoyable (seeming) conclusion.

The start and end may be somewhat drawn out, the latter to wrap up loose ends and bring a likely enjoyable conclusion for fans, but within the two core strands of Downton Abbey: A New Era there’s enough to like and be amused by to lightly pass the time well enough before things begin to get slightly overstuffed.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Anima – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 2 minutes, Director – Liliya Timirzyanova

Conductor Anna (Alina Korol) leaves her life to live alone in the quiet of the forest, however when chorister Aglaya (Elizaveta Shakira) arrives to convince her to return the two begin to form an almost silent relationship.

Anima is one of those films which is difficult to review, or even properly talk about, partly due to the fact that it’s difficult to know where to start when discussing it, and from there what to properly say about its details and elements. Perhaps this is because for much of the film it’s hard to understand what’s actually going on, or what’s trying to be said. However, the best place to start is likely at the beginning where the most coherent content lies. For the most part we follow choir conductor Anna (Alina Korol) who suddenly leaves her life as it is to live along in the quiet of the forest. We see her contemplatively staring at the sea before retreating amongst the leaves, trees and bushes. However, it appears that the choir cannot cope without her guidance, as is slightly glimpsed at as she begins to fade away from them in the opening few minutes, when chorister Aglaya (Elizaveta Shakira) finds her and asks her to return.

From this point on the film gradually begins to unravel something of a relationship between the two. Amongst the silence of their surroundings, and indeed Anna who says very little over the course of the piece, there’s something of a meditative connection formed between the two as they begin to spend their lives together. The film appears to want to say that time is slowing down for them, they may even be in an entirely different realm away from the rest of the world. Everything could very well be a metaphor. A metaphor within a metaphor. Metaphors layered on top of other metaphors to make a metaphor sandwich. Or perhaps everything is rolled up to create one giant metaphor. As the film engages this course and begins to travel down it it moves further away from the viewer as it’s increasingly difficult to understand just what’s going on, or what the film is trying to be or say.


The core point appears to be about life and death, particularly during some of the longer shots which observe the two characters going about their basic tasks, such as eating at opposite sides of a wide shot. The structure moves away from something with narrative leanings to more a collection of shots, moments and ideas. Beats with little to connect to, alongside little clue given as to what’s actually happening at any point. Rarely is there a chance to try and engage with the film after a certain point as it simply carries along it’s path with little coherence or glimmer of referencing back to a core sense of communication between the pair. Things simply happen, or rather don’t, as they go about their lack of business in the forest.

It’s a saving grace therefore that the film itself is only 62 minutes. While the opening stages are used fairly well with the initial points raised they only act as a depiction of ‘before the forest’ for the two characters, particularly Anna. While the early stages in the wilderness do have some mild levels of interest things soon slip away into the realms of metaphors, shots and ideas. Linked together with little to interest the viewer or keep them in the piece. You simply remain watching in deep confusion as to what everything is actually meant to mean.

Anima’s initial set-up is soon abandoned as the silent relationship of the two central characters becomes a selection of brief shots, moments and ideas. All of which feel like some form of metaphor which you can never quite get your head around in the eventually lengthy 62 minute run-time.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Silent River – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 2 hours 1 minute, Director – Chris Chan Lee

While attempting to reconcile with his wife, Elliot (West Liang) meets mysterious figure Greta (Amy Tsang), who looks exactly like his wife and appears to be hiding something, in a desert motel.

There’s much within the opening expositional shots of writer-director Chris Chan Lee’s Silent River which sets in a feeling of entrapment. The opening long-shot tracking initial central figure Elliot (West Liang) as he drives through open, desert plains occasionally gazes at the sky. A sky which looks almost like a painting, as if Elliot is stuck in one, under someone else’s view and control. It matches up with the isolation of the motel room in which he starts to stay in while attempting to reconnect with his estranged wife over the phone – long shots show the area from each corner and further provide the feeling of being watched. It’s part of a slow build-up, settling in the idea that there’s perhaps a threat within the environment keeping the central figure in place, a thought which is expanded upon as we’re introduced to Greta (Amy Tsang), a mysterious woman who appears to look exactly like Elliot’s wife and alongside that seems to be hiding something.

As Elliot begins to try to learn more about Greta and what she might be hiding Lee’s film echoes vibes of David Robert Mitchell’s Under The Silver Lake. Layers of mystery and ambiguity are created as various other genres are introduced and played around with, particularly those of a sci-fi and horror nature. The horror itself, particularly in lengthier sequences, may not always click, it’s generally quite hit or miss, however as the slight sci-fi nature is expanding it helps to push the mystery and level of intrigue the viewer has in the world that’s being established within the confines of the motel. While playing around with these various different tones and ideas Lee generally manages to keep a good balance throughout the film to help keep the audience engaged, and certainly not go overboard with anything – providing a consistent level of interest and intrigue in the unfolding revelations and events.


Most of these arrive in the second half of the film, where things are switched from ambiguity to a more direct narrative and set of events. This is also when the central figure appears to change from Elliot to Greta – making it easier to reveal various points and elements. An element of mystery remains within the piece, but one which is translated into threat within the futuristic aspects that are presented. It works within the slightly different flow and style of the second half, which manages to provide answers and progress the narrative further in a different way without feeling like a different film. It’s handled well and helps to keep you engaged within the unfolding strands and twists which are displayed within the obscurities and genres that make up the film.

Perhaps things don’t quite hold up in the final slow-mo infused stages, where things feel slight tangential compared to everything that has come beforehand. Alongside somewhat calling back to the opening stages, with things feeling somewhat uneven, although, luckily, the film avoids feeling as if it crashes into itself. There’s still a watchable and interesting nature to it, however it feels clear that the strengths lie within the central 80-90 minutes of the piece rather than the opening and closing 15-20 – where things are either being brought in and established or brought back to wrap up. But, luckily there’s plenty of mystery within the film and its well-balanced mixture of tones and genres. You can certainly tell its handful of inspirations, while never feeling that it gets bogged down by trying to reference or call back to them – successfully relying on its own narrative strengths and mysteries instead. Creating an interesting sense of ambiguity throughout to heighten the genre tones and drama at play within the confines of the limited setting.

While the opening and closing stages might feel slightly detached from the rest of the film, the majority of Silent River is a well-executed blend of genres which mix together to create a fine sense of ambiguity before a more direct narrative shift, largely in the vein of the likes of Under The Silver Lake.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Pink Opaque – Review

Release Date – Available now, Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 30 minutes, Director – Derrick Perry

A struggling Los Angeles film student (Elijah Boothe) attempts to put together his final project while charting a growing romantic relationship and connecting with his career-fading uncle (Chaim Dunbar).

There’s much of within co-writer (alongside Dave Ragsdale) and director Derrick Perry’s Pink Opaque which is concerned with its characters trying to prove themselves in some form or another. Central figure Travis (Elijah Boothe) is a struggling film student, attempting to put together his final film to little positive response from his professor, who picks apart many of the details which he is presented with. There’s a risk that Travis’ project won’t even be screened as part of the upcoming college showcase. Yet, despite the odds, he’s determined to not join “the rest of the people with a meaningless degree to give meaningless answers to meaningless questions”. He needs to find inspiration for his short, to give it an identity, and alongside that he needs money – turning to his somewhat distant uncle, Robin (Chaim Dunbar) for financial help.

Robin too is looking for inspiration to keep himself relevant as a television producer, his career having begun to fade as he ages and moves away from what’s currently trending. He hopes that his nephew will somehow be able to have an idea which can launch him back to success. Yet, his nephew is juggling more than just his short and financial worries as his relationship with girlfriend Kristen (Ruby Park) grows, despite the strong objections of her older brother (Daniel C.). Much like Travis the film is trying to balance a number of different elements and aspects in such a short amount of time. It results in a feeling that what we’re seeing is a selection of patches of ideas and moments before moving on to the next point or character, instead of a properly overarching narrative.


With so much going on for each of the different characters, and so much of it kept separate up until the final stages – when even then things don’t quite gel together – it’s difficult to connect with the film or anyone in it with so much jumping going on. It simply leads to a distance being created between the viewer and the film as there’s no real time for a hook to be formed with each element and figure. The personal dramas don’t have the strength or development to properly connect with you and bring you in meaning that you simply sit watching a slight jumble of bits and ideas, changing perspectives and moments which never quite have enough to grab you or simply bring you in to the piece as a whole.

As elements do begin to come together the dramatic impact simply isn’t there, particularly in the attempted escalations of the final 20 minutes. There’s been little to draw you in up until this point, yet it feels that even the mesh of everything having finally come together still has little effect overall. You simply remain watching what happens with little to react to or engage with due to the overstuffed and jumpy nature of everything that has come beforehand. Perhaps if it were dealing with less perspectives then there may be a feeling of more narrative and better flow to the piece as a whole.

By juggling the different ideas and perspectives characters in such a short amount of time Pink Opaque ends up feeling like more a selection of moments than a flowing structure, leading to a feeling of distance between the viewer.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Casablanca Beats – Review

Release Date – 29th April 2022, Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 42 minutes, Director – Nabil Ayouch

Through the help of their teacher (Anas Basbousi), a group of teenagers at a cultural centre learn how to overcome the shackles of politics and tradition through the expression of hip-hop and rap.

Shortly after the idea enters the mind that Casablanca Beats has links to the likes of School Of Rock a poster for the film appears in the background, on the classroom wall. A wall filled with its fair share of colours, posters and graffiti – just some of the ways in which the teenage students are introduced to a safe space in which they can discuss and express themselves. It’s a box from the outside world where they learn about rap and hip-hop from their teacher Anas (Anas Basbousi) – perhaps a former rapper himself – using the music and lyrics which they create to express themselves and release their anger and stresses over the politics and traditions in their country through the attitude in their delivery.

While not quite a film that has the students standing on their desks reciting “O captain, my captain” the focus isn’t quite on the effects that Anas has, but more the effects that rap has, Anas acting as more of a catalyst and support. It comes across in the relatively plotless nature of the film, instead detailing the change and development experienced by the handful of teenagers in the class. The way in which they are impacted by the music and their lives change due to them trying to take more control and action – sometimes through the expression of rap itself, one key scene involves young teenager Nouhaila (Nouhaila Arif) pouring out her feelings through her rhymes to her controlling older brother. There’s a brief strand for each of the central figures, depicting their repressive home lives and what their own lyrics are fighting against. These don’t exactly create any form of narrative, although show an individual arc of sorts for each figure, and perhaps because of this there’s an occasionally disjointed nature to the piece with its scene-by-scene nature.


Yet, all comes together in full-class debates and conversations regarding politics and beliefs. Thoughts and opinions flying around the room in extended sequences. While some feel a bit lengthy, the film itself gets out just before it feels like it may go on for a bit too long, there’s still enough interest in what’s being discussed to keep you engaged in the moment. Perhaps the most interesting point is that such conversations are being held in what feels like a fairly family-friendly film (albeit one with a couple of f-bombs). The BBFC 12 rating is certainly justified, but there still feels like a relatively universal (maybe not quite for the younger kids, though) feel to director Nabil Ayouch’s film, and his screenplay co-written with Maryam Touzani, once again bringing about that School Of Rock connection. It helps to further bring to life what the students are facing, and to some extent Anas as he tries to fight against parents perceptions of what he is teaching – and at times the heads of the arts centre he is teaching at.

Things come together to create an interesting and engaging film that works because of the way it focus on the effect of rap on the students over anything else. Showing them opening up and beginning to attempt to take more control of their own lives amidst the restrictions of their families and country’s traditions. While the occasional glimpses into these separate family lives does create something of a slightly disjointed feel to the film there’s still plenty to like, and a slight connection formed with the figures on screen – even if not quite on an individual level. Things move along rather well and you’re generally well-engaged throughout with your interest in the development of the characters, shown in the conversations and debates which they engage in with increasing confidence – moving from the classroom to the streets to the potential of the stage. It works well in its vein, allowing the music and lyrics to speak for themselves and help move things along at the character’s pace, simply adding another layer to the nature of the development.

There’s an interesting nature to the School Of Rock-esque feel of Casablanca Beats, while allowing the rap to move and develop things within the scene-by-scene nature of the occasionally disjointed narrative. Holding your involvement and interest for the most part, particularly when it comes to the growth and change of the central class.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent – Review

Release Date – 22nd April 2022, Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 47 minutes, Director – Tom Gormican

Considering retiring from acting Nicolas Cage (Nicolas Cage) is offered a million dollars to attend a wealthy fan’s birthday party, however when Javi (Pedro Pascal) is revealed to be the head of a major cartel Cage is recruited by the CIA to help take him down.

Over the years, after having been made into so many memes, Nicolas Cage has perhaps warped in the eyes of some into a meme himself. It would be so easy for The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent, where the actor plays himself, to be filled with references and jokes to his career, a self-aware film filled with memes, and yet it doesn’t. It almost feels as if the lead could be any actor playing themselves, or an actor playing a fictional actor. Yet, there’s something rather clever about the idea of Nick Cage playing Nick Cage, particularly within this film. Allowing for a celebration of both his career and him simply being him, while managing to provide a couple of gags along the way.

Here we find the fictional version of Cage considering retiring from acting, after a series of bad auditions and readings for parts. This all going against the wishes of a 90s version of himself, loud and highly energetic – donning a Wild At Heart t-shirt and a leather jacket – a figure which screams the famous appearance the actor made on Wogan where he backflipped in and kicked the air. He’s in serious debt to the hotel he’s been staying at and the thing that could make that all go away is the offer of one million dollars to attend the birthday party of a wealthy fan, Javi (Pedro Pascal – having a lot of fun playing a complete ‘silly character’). However, not long after arrival Cage discovers from CIA operatives Vivan (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) that Javi is the head of a major cartel who have kidnapped the daughter of one of the candidates in the upcoming Catalonian presidential election in the hope of fixing it. Soon he’s recruited by the pair to both get answers and track down Maria (Katrin Vankova).


A series of good performances, particularly Cage who is great as the fictionalised version/s of himself, help to bring about much of the comedy throughout the piece. While slightly prodding at action film conventions there’s generally plenty straying away from such a nature which helps the overall piece along. Allowing it to not feel tired or reliant on both knowing Cage’s career (although also featuring enough for fans of the actor) or a completely self-aware nature. It’s certainly a respectful screenplay for the actor from co-writers Kevin Etten and Tom Gormican – the latter also taking on directing duties – where narrative is put as at much of a core focus as the lead star. While this narrative may feel somewhat crammed into the third act, due to the jokes and scenes of the budding friendship between Nick and Javi – which provides plenty of laughs and chuckles throughout as the core focus of many scenes – what comes before is undeniably entertaining and at least drops some build up to it instead of forcing everything all at once towards the end in the hope of forming some kind of last-minute arc.

Yet, what makes the film click is the way in which it looks at and discusses the central figure of Nicolas Cage. The career which he has had, and will have. He’s cleverly used and cast in the film, with a different actor this would be very different, this has, of course, been tailored to Cage but in such a specific way that still manages to avoid feeling cliché or obvious. It helps to bring you in to the various scenes and moments of this fictionalised version of him, trying to be better while coping with a career breakdown. There’s so much the screenplay could easily dive into and yet it manages to avoid it all by remaining direct with its narrative, the friendship at the centre of the piece, never overinflating Cage or his presence in the film – he is as much a player/ character in this film as everyone else – and making an entertaining piece of work with plenty of laughs throughout. And it works because it looks at Nicolas Cage instead of a potential comedic perception, making it all the better for having done that.

The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent works because it avoids a self-aware feel. Leaning into Nicolas Cage the actor instead of the meme. Cage is great in the leading role with a supporting cast who help bring about many of the laughs. The third act may feel somewhat busy, but there’s still plenty to enjoy throughout, especially within the central friendship.

Rating: 4 out of 5.