LFF 2019: Cold Case Hammarskjöld – Review

Release date – N/A, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 2 hours 8 minutes, Director – Mads Brügger

Journalist Mads Brügger attempts to uncover the events behind the mysterious death of U.N. General Secretary Dag Hammarskjöld.

“I’m a bit confused because there are a lot of names and many people here” says one of the two typists that journalist Mads Brügger gets to recount his tangent filled story behind the various conspiracies surrounding the death of former U.N. General Secretary Dag Hammarskjöld in a plane crash in 1961, around halfway through his documentary about such research. “Yes, it’s very complicated” he replies in a rather dead-pan manner, as if trying to reflect on his whole experience in such a brief couple of seconds. After seven years of researching the topic it’s understandable how it could be with every piece of information discovered the story could easily become confusing.

However, it seems that much of the research leads Brügger and companion Göran Björkdahl to near dead-ends – many of which are shown in the film. Leading the pair to discover various different ideas and sub-conspiracies that begin to distract from the main objective of the documentary overall. While some tangents do link to the titular research they do tend to be rather lengthy. Leading to a fluctuating state of interest for the viewer and an overall uneven feel. Much of this comes from the fact that many of the believed reasons behind the death of Dag Hammarskjöld are conspiracies. Conspiracies with no majorly known origin, so after hearing the basics from people near the site of the crash there’s not a great deal to go on. “You don’t mind about what was supposed to be solved in the first place” asks one of the typists as even she begins to notice that almost an entirely different story is being told.

In a number of ways the way the piece unfolds is much alike to Louis Theroux’s My Scientology Movie in the way that there’s so little known about the central focus, and not many ways to get information about it, that much of the time it feels like thing’s are so secretive that there’s nowhere that the film can possibly go. When this is the case the film seems to rely on previously shown content, jumping back and forth between different ideas – despite a chaptered nature seemingly being used to make things easier to follow through the creation of some form of narrative – often showing a group digging for evidence of the crash – equipped with piths and celebratory cigars for when something’s finally found. It’s light moments of humour like this that begin to feel scripted when heavily leaned on, pushed further by the use of two typists – not explained until lightly touched upon at the very end of the film. Leading to the film almost feeling like a mockumentary at times rather than a documentary, especially during the opening 15-20 minutes of the piece.

While there is a fair deal of interest and intrigue in the central idea that the film tries to solve the various tangents do get in the way. Leading to the tension that a documentary like this, with the darker undertones that are gradually discovered, should have not quite being present. The film fluctuates for lengthy periods of time, often based on what’s being discussed or looked into on screen at the time. If it weren’t for such moments then the documentary may have turned out to be a fair deal more interesting than it is. However, because of the length of time such tangents last for the interest and overall engagement of the viewer varies throughout, and at times almost makes the film seem far too scripted and at times almost like a mockumentary.

“I hoped that this would save my career as a journalist” Brügger explains late into the film about the reasons behind why he decided to make this documentary. And why the research has obviously been put in what’s used could use some refining. Looking more into the basis of the film rather than the various other pieces of information that pop up and at times seem to dominate over what were initially the central themes.

In many ways Cold Case Hammarskjöld is a highly conflicted documentary. If it didn’t fluctuate as much and focused more on its central themes then maybe it would be a more interesting affair. However, with such little content to go on it occasionally struggles and at others feels far too scripted.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

In Bruges – Alternative Christmas Film Screening

As an alternative Christmas film for this year’s festive season I’m going to be introducing Martin McDonaugh’s Oscar nominated feature directorial debut, the hilarious black comedy, In Bruges!

The screening will be held at Vue Bristol Longwell Green on Sunday 15th December at 16:00. Information on how to reserve tickets can be found below.

Starring Brendan Gleeson, Colin Farrell and Ralph Fiennes, In Bruges follows two hitmen (Farrell and Gleeson) who are sent to the Belgian town of Bruges after a job goes wrong. There they must await instructions from their insatiably foul-mouthed boss Harry (Fiennes).

The film, first released in 2008, marks the feature directorial debut of Martin McDonaugh, who received an Oscar nomination and BAFTA win for Best Original Screenplay for this film, and would go on to make the acclaimed awards hit Three Billboards Outside, Ebbing Missouri.

Filled with the style of jet black comedy that McDonaugh has come to be associated with, and featuring two of the greatest insults in cinema history, In Bruges is a truly hilarious film. Filled with strong performances, wonderfully dark comedy, equally effective violence, and a fresh – even after 11 years – take on the British gangster film, showing what happens after the job. It’s definitely something to get everyone (18 and above – for a number of good reasons) into the festive spirit!

However, enough tickets need to be reserved through Ourscreen by 8th December for the screening to go ahead. No money is taken out of your account if the screening doesn’t go ahead/ get confirmed.

A Facebook event page can be found here.
And the trailer for the film here

So, please share, help spread the word and reserve a ticket and hopefully this can be a great screening of a modern British alternative Christmas classic.

LFF 2019: The Father – Review

Release Date – N/A, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 31 minutes, Directors –  Kristina Grozeva and Petar Valchanov

A grieving man (Ivan Barnev) must look after his recently widowed father (Ivan Savov) who tries to track down his recently deceased wife when he believes that she has somehow made contact

As Ivan Barnev’s Pavel pushes through a grieving crowd at an almost finished funeral, in the grey cold, making his way to the front where he struggles to light a candle. It’s at this very early point of The Father that the mild sense of dark comedy is clearly established. However, the humour within the film is more emotional rather than dark, showcasing the emotionally tinged humour of grief.

The funeral which Pavel attends is that of his mother, a death that has a huge impact on his father, Vasil (Ivan Savov). However, it’s not long until a friend claims that she received a phone call from the recently departed wife. On hearing this Vasil immediately sets off in the hope of being able to somehow contact his wife, his son following close behind trying to talk sense into him.

As Vasil finds himself going to people who claim to be able to communicate with the dead, something which Pavel insists is a scam, who send him to sleep in the woods, the film never laughs at him as a character, or his grief. Instead the laughs come at the straight seriousness and frustration of his son, whose perspective the film is shown from. The pair creating an almost odd-couple style duo, as is often standard with a number of father-son road trip comedies.

Of course Pavel himself has his own struggles outside of what he views as his father’s delusions, but not quite on a similar scale. As he finds his situation with his father becoming increasingly out of control; to the point where the police become involved, Pavel’s other major worry is finding some specific homemade quince jam for his pregnant wife. And as all Pavel’s world appears to fall apart around him the theme of grief is never forgotten. Almost seeming to pull the pair apart as they start to loose their temper with each other, to an extent presenting a true father and son story.

Arguably a number of these elements are rather conventional, however with the well-placed humour of the first half much of this doesn’t seem to matter. It’s only as the second half arrives that things become much more obvious in how cliche and conventional they are. The film begins to gradually drop the comedy for more quiet, dramatic moments to focus on developing the relationship of the father and son to get ready for the end of the film. As this becomes the case ideas begin to be repeated and the film as a whole becomes much slower. The feeling begins to set in that potentially it would work better as a short rather than a feature as the initial tone and feeling that was once present and made for an enjoyable first half almost seems to be lost. Resulting in a somewhat underwhelming pay-off when everything ends.

While The Father’s first half has a number of good laughs and a true feel of a grief tinged father-son piece the feeling of convention soon sets in, exchanging comedy for grey drama and the feeling that maybe this would work better as a short film.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

LFF 2019: Saint Maud – Review

Release date – N/A, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 24 minutes, Director – Rose Glass

A devout Christian nurse ( Morfydd Clark) becomes obsessed with saving the soul of her severely ill patient (Jennifer Ehle)

From the opening scene of Rose Glass’ feature directorial debut the viewer is put on the edge of their seat with intrigue and tension. As they see the figure of Morfydd Clark’s Maud crouched, alone, in the corner of a dimly lit room, after what seems to be a surgery gone wrong. From this very early point the idea that the central figure of the piece is always being spied on – the camera always seemingly put in the corner of a room, looking through a keyhole or gap in a door, or simply looking at the main character through a crowd – is used to full effect. Pushing the feeling of Maud’s strong connection with God and her faith further.

Maud is a devout Christian nurse, assigned to look after a rich, severely ill patient, Amanda (Jennifer Ehle). Amanda spends much of her time drinking, taking drugs and occasionally holding lavish parties. Maud strongly disapproves on this lifestyle and feels that she has been called to save the soul of her patient. As her intentions become clearer, and her behaviours more peculiar Maud begins to have a number of visions. Her faith almost becomes so strong that it begins to seemingly mentally damage her.

The narrative of the film is very much told through the central figure’s prayers, everything comes from her perspective. Leading to a sense of mystery due to only one side of the story being shown. Glass’s decision to never show what ‘actually’ happens – until the very end of the film – adds to the fear factor and overall tension that her film holds. Emphasised not only by the quietness of a number of the scenes; reflecting the standard nature of Maud herself, but also by the use of half-shadowed lighting, demonstrating the conflicted nature of the character and the way that the audience could perceive the narrative, and Maud’s mental state.

Further fuelled by the slow pacing of the film, gradually hinting at new ideas through the inclusion of small, simple details there’s no denying the unsettling nature of the film. Pushed on by the unsettling movements that Clark adds to bring her character further to life.

However, amongst all the elements of horror within the film, Saint Maud begins to feel somewhat slack when dealing with much quieter, more dramatic moments, which do seem to be rather lengthy when they do appear. While the performances in such scenes are still strong and help to progress the ideas that Glass tries to get across with her direction and screenplay the scenes can feel as if they’re building up to something that never quite arrives. Despite this there is still a fair deal to enjoy within Saint Maud as a whole. The performances are strong, with as many subtle details as are held within the rest of the film to make it all the more tense and engaging. Constantly leading the viewer to question what’s really happening, what’s real and what’s not.

Saint Maud works best when leaning towards its more horror oriented elements, while the drama sequences can seem a bit too long and quiet there’s still plenty to like within Clark’s leading performance, strengthened by the simple yet effective details that Glass adds in her effective feature directorial debut.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

LFF 2019: The Personal History Of David Copperfield – Review

Release date – 24th January 2020, Run-time – 1 hour 59 minutes,
Cert – PG, Director – Armando Iannucci

David Copperfield (Dev Patel) recounts his life from the poverty and rags of childhood to the struggles of adulthood.

Over the past few years Armando Iannucci has made a name for himself through his often biting satires. Rising from his days as a writer on the Alan Partridge team he has found himself creating The Thick Of It, and eventual big-screen outing In The Loop, alongside 2017’s The Death Of Stalin.

Now Iannucci stays within the realm of the period piece, however this time with a lighter, possibly more family oriented style. Much of this coming from his decision to adapt the words of Charles Dickens, which some might say is almost the polar opposite of the works that helped make him famous.

The Personal History Of David Copperfield follows Dev Patel’s titular Copperfield recounting his life from the rags and harsh conditions of his childhood – forced to work in a glass bottle making factory – to the struggles of his adult life, continuing to deal with those who were a part of his growing up; who almost seem to be invading his adulthood.

Amongst all the lightly, yet convincingly, held drama the standard brand of Iannucci comedy remains present. Often well-placed and naturalistic the frequently whimsical wit helps to form a fine tone for the film that helps to form a connection both with the central character and the world that he creates – the film being told from his perspective as part of a talk. With a cast that includes the likes of Tilda Swinton, Ben Whishaw, Peter Capaldi and Hugh Laurie there’s plenty of likeable British talent to help bring the world and characters to life. Each cast member clearly understands the eccentricity of their character, yet also the upset and almost tragedy that lingers within their lives. Iannucci’s screenplay effectively combining both of these elements with his sense of warmth and wit to create something undeniably inviting.

At one point Capaldi’s Mr Micawber states “We do currently exist primarily al fresco” – a line which sums up much of the wit and upset of the film. In fact Iannucci himself has said that there is “a sadness to the portrayal” of a number of the characters. One that brings an element of honesty into the piece, showing everyone with their flaws, allowing for a greater connection to be formed. Even if some traits do include constantly chasing people on donkeys, and occasionally kicking the rider off, due to not allowing them on, or near, the property – a recurring trait for Swinton’s Betsey Trotwood.

Everything simply combines to create a more charming, warm and witty piece. As if the words of Dickens’ novel have literally been somehow exactly translated to the screen. The film very much feels like it might do to read the book it’s based on. Through an all-star cast, and in fact the character of David Copperfield himself, Iannucci creates something very close to his own Paddington. Through it’s detail and insanely likeable characters the film just works, bringing the viewer in and never quite letting go of it’s grip on them.

Filled with wonderfully eccentric, likeable characters, never forgetting upset and tragedy, The Personal History Of David Copperfield shows new ground for Armando Iannucci. While still brilliantly funny this latest feature shows his warmth and emotion instead of fear.

Rating: 4 out of 5.