LFF 2020: Delia Derbyshire: The Myths And Legendary Tapes – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 38 minutes, Director – Caroline Catz

Docudrama blending discovered tapes and recreations of influential, experimental sound designer and musician Delia Derbyshire (Caroline Catz) as she works in the BBC basement.

Delia Derbyshire is perhaps best known for creating the iconic theme to Doctor Who. However, the aim of Caroline Catz’s docudrama on Derbyshire is to highlight her experimental, forward-thinking nature as a sound designed and musician. Working her way up through BBC rankings, although seemingly staying stuck in the cramped basement with all the sound equipment, there’s plenty to delve into when it comes to her creations. The more documentary leanings of the piece look into just this, using discovered tapes, recordings and diaries of the titular subject to get a picture of her creativity and innovative musical style. Meanwhile, the dramatised elements look more into Derbyshire’s personal life, trying to be heard and facing competition within a mid-20th Century BBC.

As the film progresses it certainly seems to focus more on the reimagined side of Derbyshire’s life (Derbyshire played by writer-director Catz, who appears to have truly put herself into the mindset of the figure her piece focuses on). While starting off as engaging and interesting, particularly capturing the slight imagination of the viewer when paired with the documentary-based moments, the more the drama comes into the play the more it begins to feel like a one-off BBC drama. This is no bad thing, it still works and keeps the viewer engaged. However, as it progresses the feeling arises that it could possibly be better digested in 30 minute chunks, rather than as a complete 98 minute film.

You wish for more of the experimental elements to play a bigger part, to become more of the focus – such moments truly feel reflective of the image of Derbyshire that the film creates. To start with there’s a shared tone and feeling that gets her mindset across to the viewer and adds something to the film, giving it a further layer of detail and engagement for those watching. However, as the film fades away into the drama it appears to lose what it was beforehand and becomes slightly more generic, losing the attention of the viewer along with it. A shame for something that starts out, much like Derbyshire herself, as something rather experimental, made more engaging and interesting because of the personal dash that runs throughout it.

This look into the work of Delia Derbyshire starts off as a seemingly personal, experimental look to match her music. However, it seems to lose something as it delves further into it’s gradually less-effective dramatic elements.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

LFF 2020: The Salt In Our Waters – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 46 minutes, Director – Rezwan Shahriar Sumit

A young artist (Titas Zia) finds a small fishing village turning against him, his creations and most of all his modern-world views and knowledge.

The picturesque sights, sounds and colours of the Bangladeshi fishing village that young artist Rudro (Titas Zia) arrives in at the beginning of writer-director Rezwan Shahriar Sumit’s debut feature initially appear to be like those on an idealistic travel brochure. However, as he acquaints himself with the locals the response is much colder than the environment he finds himself having visited for inspiration. The village, far different to his home city, is already experiencing problems when it comes to the fish that they catch; the annual monsoon has failed to arrive, something which is blamed on Rudro’s presence, meaning that there’s little intake.

Rudro particularly finds himself battling with the iron-fisted Chairman (Fazlur Rahman Babu). He believes that the stranger’s sculptures and mannequins are false gods that have curse the small, isolated community, although Rudro claims that this is an effect of unheard of climate change. Soon rumours are spread and Zia’s protagonist becomes the target of fear, uncertainty and misconceptions amongst the people who are guided by the Chairman. After all, this man has arrived and instantly begun to corrupt the children with art lessons and other non-fishing related frivolities. From these clashes arrives heated tension between the forces, felt in their exchanges, particularly from Babu’s strong performance of rage.


The Chairman’s situation is made worse when it turns out that his daughter, Tuni (Tasnova Tamanna), has been growing closer to what he perceives to be a disturber of the peace and the community’s order and obedience. It simply adds to the fire of the film’s events, enough to keep you engaged and interested within the narrative, which does mostly lean towards Rudro’s feuds with, and protests against the views of, the Chairman. There’s interest in how things are going to pan out and good performances from the whole cast allow for further engagement within the piece. During some exchanges you find yourself caught in the crossfire, watching unsure as to who might come out worse from it. Such battles between young and old, city-life and isolation, familiarity and outside ideas make for a strong debut from Rezwan Shahriar Sumit that engages with the heated exchanges and challenges between characters well and brings the viewer in well-enough for the experience.

The Salt In Our Waters is an interesting depiction of two different societal beliefs and ideals, there’s tension in the two central performances as they feud throughout Rezwan Shahriar Sumit’s debut feature.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2020: Limbo – Review

Release Date – 30th July 2021, Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 43 minutes, Director – Ben Sharrock

A group of asylum seekers try to make their way in a remote area of Scotland, unsure as to whether they will be granted asylum or not, or what is happening to their families back home.

Writer-director Ben Sharrock reveals an admirable talent for creating comedy within tragedy and uncertainty. He follows a group of asylum seekers, unsettled, waiting for asylum approval, in a remote part of Scotland. Particularly we see the world through the eyes of Omar (Amir El-Masry), trying to make his way as a musician while his parents are in Istanbul and his brother potentially still in Syria. Living in a cramped, undecorated house with fellow asylum seekers worried that they won’t be allowed to live in the UK. Reflecting their home, and their reluctance to properly settle, the village they’re placed into is almost empty. Empty of life, decoration, entertainment or proper help, like a dilapidated off-the-map Royston Vasey. Even the local shop – with one, monotone member of staff reminding people to “please refrain from urinating in the freezer aisle” – seems empty of produce, specifically the spices that Omar is looking for.

A local centre holds meetings for all the asylum seekers in the area. Each one scared, worried and fearing about their future. Not helped by the cringe-inducing leaders of the group Helga (Sidse Babett Knudsen) and, particularly, Boris (Kenneth Collard). Both of whom are trying to teach the group the basics of living in the UK, being emotionally open and practicing job interview techniques. However, when everyone has been in the titular limbo for so long the energy vanishes from the room. They sit huddled together in the echoing room, being subjected to citizenship classes, and the slightly more bearable plastic chairs. In true darkly tragic comedy one member of the group admits “I used to be happy before I came here. I used to cry myself to sleep every night, but now I don’t have any tears left”. It’s a line that would fit right in with an emotional drama on the same subject, but induces tears of laughter, with a layered impact, that like many other jokes still have you chuckling minutes later.


On a number of occasions the slightly absurd, yet all too real, humour does have a slight air of a Taika Waititi film about it. Finding humour in loneliness and the isolation of characters, outsiders from the rest of the world, trying to find their place. There’s a bond formed with Omar and his fellow asylum seekers, not just because of the laughs that the actors, and screenplay, help to produce, but because of the heart and understanding that the film emits and allows the viewer to connect with. Amongst all of this there’s plenty of laugh-out-loud tear-inducing moments. Admittedly such happenings somewhat vanish in the second half of the film as the drama takes centre stage. This works well and makes for an engaging story thanks to the characters, and makes a difference from the dips in and out in the first half of the film, but it feels as if the humour has almost been abandoned. You do slightly wish you could see more mishaps with a stolen chicken in the household, or at least a bit more lightness for balance within this generally different tone.

However, even throughout the more present drama there’s still plenty of heart and warmth towards the characters. Consideration towards their situation and an emotional understanding with their thoughts and feelings. It comes through in layered performances that match a screenplay that has plenty of comedy which also doubles as tragic emotion of people lost within a spiralling system of uncertainty and fear. There are plenty of different things that can be taken away from Limbo, all thanks to Ben Sharrock’s careful exercising of his themes and ideas, alongside thoughtfulness for his characters and the situation that they find themselves in, in the middle of nowhere. It’s a fine subversion of tragedy into comedy, and there’s plenty of laughs to be found within Limbo, while not forgetting the fear and worry that runs through the people facing the lengthy asylum system.

Hilariously turning tragedy into comedy Limbo never forgets it’s heart and understanding of its characters, the humour may drop in the second half, but the drama is certainly still effective and provides more to the layered meanings and impacts of many lines of dialogue beforehand.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

LFF 2020: After Love – Review

Release Date – 4th June 2021, Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 29 minutes, Director – Aleem Khan

On finding out that her husband (Nasser Memarzia) was having an affair, Mary (Joanna Scanlan) travels across the English Channel to France to learn more about his second life.

We see very little of Mary (Joanna Scanlen) and her husband Ahmed (Nasser Memarzia) together. That of which we do see suggests a potentially distant relationship. As they return home one evening Mary goes to make tea as her husband sits down in the other room, still in frame. In the dimly lit shot we see him unexplainedly pass away. Although there’s a hint of distance between the pair Mary’s pain is still clear. The impact of her husband’s death weighs on her immediately as her quiet life possibly becomes ever quieter.

However, she soon discovers that Ahmed, a ferry boat captain between France and England, was having an affair on the other side of the English Channel. Wishing to learn about his second life she travels to France to meet the woman he was having an affair with. Soon after arriving in the country she finds herself becoming the cleaner for Genevieve (Nathalie Richard) and her son Solomon (Talid Ariss) as they prepare to move house, both fully expecting Ahmed to turn up. As she learns about Ahmed’s second family Mary gradually grows close to, even if still with uncertainty and apprehension on both sides, Solomon as he opens up about his relationship with his father. It’s in these two characters that we find the most connection and understanding, they certainly get a fair-deal of screen-time and perhaps their distance with the same character creates interest in terms of how their viewpoints, ages and responses differ. Feelings that are brought about by the strength and consistency of the two performances.


The two figures, who appear to have spent their lives keeping their emotions held in and speaking little to anyone outside of their small spheres, create a gradual bond. One where they discover more about each other, particularly Mary about Solomon, and begin to open up, even if not always intentionally. There’s enough present within the narrative to keep things flowing well enough. This is a quiet drama. One of character detail and elements instead of spectacle. The key themes and details are those based around connections between people of different backgrounds, and the common ground that they share, leading to understanding and connection.

You do at times feel yourself simply watching the characters engaging with their surroundings, and those in the same environment, rather than properly emotionally engaging with them. It’s perhaps part of the effect of what is a very quiet, fairly observant, film. However, when an element of development comes in and the emotional aspects of, and connections between, characters are focused on there’s certainly something engaging that provides enough to make the overall viewing worthwhile.

Amongst the quietness that sets the tone of After Love there’s enough character detail and development within the connections formed that make it a worthwhile watch, brought about especially by Joanna Scanlan’s strong central performance.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Wild Mountain Thyme – Review

Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 43 minutes, Director – John Patrick Shanley

Farmers Rosemary (Emily Blunt) and Anthony (Jamie Dornan) have known each other since childhood, however Anthony’s father’s (Christopher Walken) decision as to who he leaves his farm to could break the pair’s relationship.

Wild Mountain Time, adapted by writer-director John Patrick Shanley from his stage-play Outside Mullingar, begins as it means to go on a sentimentalists ad for the Irish Tourism Board. Beginning with shots of rural Ireland we hear a voiceover that chirpily acknowledges “welcome to Ireland”. A sentence that, when matched with the visuals, demonstrates a hopeful fairy tale-like view of the country. As the voiceover goes on we learn that we’re being spoken to by the truly shoddy accent of Tony Reilly (Christopher Walken, who looks as if he’s recovering from the shock of electrocution, confused as to how he found himself lost in this film). As he informs us in an equally cheerful manner “I’m dead” this portrait of the Emerald Isle’s countryside is revealed to be more ‘a dweam within a dweam’ than anything to be taken completely seriously.

Tony is the father of Anthony (Jamie Dornan), a dedicated farmworker who has been brought up in this environment his whole life. However, Tony is having thoughts of bequeathing his son’s wealthy American cousin Adam (Jon Hamm – one of the few cast members free to luckily use their own accent) the farm, predicting that his life is close to its end for much of his screen-time. This is poorly received by both Anthony and those on the neighbouring farm, Rosemary (Emily Blunt) and her mother Aoife (Dearbhla Molloy). Anthony and Rosemary have been friends since childhood, and while the film often pitches them as general acquaintances, or just about friends, there seems to be a bit more on at least one end of the relationship. Rosemary appears to have a potentially more romantic view for the two, although Anthony often remains oblivious to such suggestions. Carrying on blindly, talking to the donkey, in the hope of winning his father’s attention by working on the farm.

The conversation flies with romantic zingers such as “the Guinness is good”. Just one of the many hits in a screenplay that appears to imagine Ireland is a place where the romanticised language is made up of similes and metaphors, “it’s dark as tar” being one of the few early, mild, examples – with the odd “burn in hell ya sh!te horse” thrown in for good measure. Dialogue that equals the look and style of the film. One that’s set in the modern day but could very easily be a period piece, it certainly looks and feels like one. Perhaps one of the most shocking shots in the film is that of a passenger plane, it takes a couple of moments to register the fact that this exists and that the film is in fact set in the present.


All held in a film that allows it’s characters to develop through brief moments of personal dance. As they embrace their feelings in this way the world opens up, gains colour (green) and the camera speeds across the vast (green) landscapes that Ireland has to offer. Geese (not green) freely glide past the camera to express the liberty that this character has had unveiled to them. It’s the culmination of cheesy clichés that you’d expect to find in a ‘the-joke-is-its-bad’ film within a film. The likes of which have weather that magically changes depending on the situation, bucketing it down with rain in an instant if the emotional nature requires it, before clearing up just as quickly when some form of resolution arrives. This also happens in Wild Mountain Thyme.

A film that has plenty of entertaining moments, although perhaps not in the way intended; when the piece actually does seem to be aiming for laughs none arrive. Instead it’s met with a kind of awkward, stony response that contrasts with that to the seeming romantic drama that’s trying to play out. While the tone and response might be inconsistent, one thing that’s for certain is that nothing will prepare you for the sensational twist. One that, much like the plane, leaves you at something of a standstill as you have to take time to completely take in and understand what’s just happened. It almost makes everything that’s come before it worth it, and there’s certainly some amusement to be found within what precedes this moment. Unfortunately, there’s also a fair deal that isn’t so good.

A number of Wild Mountain Thyme’s Irish accents match the inauthentic vision of Ireland that it presents. It might have some amusing moments, but often not for the right reasons.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Without Remorse – Review

Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 49 minutes, Director – Stefano Sollima

When his pregnant wife (Lauren London) is killed in the night Navy-SEAL John Kelly (Michael B. Jordan) takes it upon himself to get revenge, uncovering a potentially bubbling war between the US and Russia.

Without Remorse is potentially one of the biggest tests of Michael B. Jordan’s career so far. There are a number of occasions throughout it’s fairly by-the-numbers 109 minute run-time where his charisma has a lot of heavy lifting to do. And he manages to come out of it unscathed, giving a good performance within an otherwise somewhat generic film.

Jordan plays Navy-SEAL John Kelly, an expectant father who returns from a complicated mission in Syria to almost instant tragedy. Woken up in the middle of the night to a deadly home invasion he finds his pregnant wife (Lauren London) killed, with many of his team from his most recent mission suddenly murdered too with what appear to be expert executions. Kelly takes it upon himself to find the people behind this, despite conflicting messages, even on home soil, with the sole intent of revenge. There’s no denying his skills, which certainly make for a handful of engaging action beats, and it only makes the threat that he poses that much greater. You begin to look forward not to seeing potential enemies be on the receiving end of his attacks, but just to see him get to work in whichever country he finds himself dropped into.


With a script co-written by Will Staples (who has action experience having written for the highly successful Call Of Duty video game franchise) and Taylor Sheridan (behind hits such as Sicario – director Stefano Sollima directed the underrated sequel) there are still a handful of scenes that feel like a mid-90’s action-thriller. Likely effects from the film having been in production since around this time, the Tom Clancy novel of the same name it’s based on published in 1993, with various screenplays adapted and re-worked over time. It’s perhaps because of this that the film has a rather predictable feel about it, particularly when it comes to it’s final stages and major reveals. Yet, there’s still a watchability to the piece. Perhaps it’s the conventional nature that allows it to go by with little issue, the feeling of it being familiar?

The plot certainly doesn’t seem to be the main reason for engagement within the piece. Themes of who the leader of Kelly’s grief is never quite has the impact that it should, although this is the case for a number of the points in which the film attempts to get an emotional response of some kind from the viewer. The core engagement is with Jordan’s central performance and the slight bursts of close-up action where the final impact may not be anything grand, but there’s certainly some mild entertainment value while it’s happening. Very much a reflection of the overall impact that Without Remorse has overall, perfectly fine while watching although not with any major impact.

Michael B. Jordan’s charisma remains solidly intact, and, alongside some bursts of brief action, helps elevate the otherwise by-the-numbers nature of Without Remorse’s forgettable narrative.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

The Mitchells Vs. The Machines – Review

Cert – PG, Run-time – 1 hour 50 minutes, Directors – Michael Rianda, Jeff Rowe

While taking daughter Katie (Abbi Jacobson) to college the Mitchell family becomes the only remaining people on Earth who can stop the technological uprising.

The standard family road trip, often shown from the children’s perspective as a hellishly restricting venture, while the parents view it as a hopeful bonding exercise. For the Mitchells it’s a journey much like their tattered vehicle, full of “character, class and some green ooze we can learn about together!” The group of four (plus, real hero, dog Monchi) are travelling across the country to take daughter Katie (Abbi Jacobson) to college in California. Katie’s relationship with her father, Rick (Danny McBride); a man who has a tendency to exclaim statements such as “it’s not illegal if you’re good at it” when skipping traffic jams in out of use lanes, begins to experience tension. She’s all set to venture further into her life of potential filmmaking – having had great success with short films and parodies on YouTube, not always to the occasional bemusement of her parents (Maya Rudolph plays Mum Linda), and entertainment of younger brother Aaron (co-writer-director, alongside Jeff Rowe, Michael Rianda) – and yet feels undermined at times by her family, particularly the almost strong lifelong relationship with her Dad.

After various rest stops and failed attempts at family bonding the proudly weird – the film is credited as being “a movie by a bunch of weird humans” – family they find themselves facing the ultimate exercise in the form of the technological uprising. When tech developer Mark Bowman’s (Eric Andre) latest advancement, a robot assistant with plenty of smart-phone like abilities, gains power of itself thanks to AI assistant PAL (Olivia Colman on consistently joyful form) it captures every human possible to launch them into space, creating a peaceful Earth for all of technology. When the Mitchells find themselves the last humans left they, eventually, take it upon themselves to brave the world of sentient toasters, fridges and Furbys to save all of humanity.

With a blend of 2d and 3d animation, mixing slight convention with the filmic gaze that Katie sees the world through and cartoon-like hints to show small details of character emotion and interactions with technology, there’s a distinct visual flare to the film. One that makes the world feel unique and original, engaging you further within it, and connecting you with the characters as they try to survive. As was the case with other Sony Animation project Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse, also produced by Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who, alongside The Lego Movie, prove to be a strong force in creative, boundary-breaking animation.


As was the case with previous Lord and Miller produced animated features The Mitchells Vs The Machines (originally titled Connected) packs in plenty of heart. Far from a saccharine forced message it instead feels like a finely tuned set of emotional beats that the cast and crew genuinely believe in. One that celebrates the weirdness of not just the central family but all of those involved in the making of the film, and those watching. There may be the ideals, in this case it’s neighbours the Poseys (voiced by John Legend, Chrissy Teigen and Charlyne Yi) with their family yoga sessions and peaceful retreats, but they aren’t part of the people we have a familial bond and connection to. This is far from a film that observes it’s characters as ‘quirky’ or ‘dysfunctional’ or anything close to ‘wacky’, they’re not even outsiders. Instead the Mitchells are an everyday family with their imperfections, grudges, hopes, wishes and most of all thoughts and emotions. It’s what drives them to not just fight against the robot s that they face, but to fight against them together in plenty of inventive ways – disguising the car so that it looks like it blends in with the road for example.

Such hints particularly come in during the second half of the piece. The often laugh-out-loud humour is definitely still present, and each scene continues to overflow with creativity that uses the animated form to full advantage while managing to not go towards the realms of pure stupidity. And while the final events do add to the near two hour run-time there’s a fair deal of entertainment value to be found that keeps things running smoothly enough until the end.

Perhaps the best testament to the film is the fact that it can use references to popular internet videos, including one to the ten year old Nyan Cat, and not feel cringeworthy or as if it’s trying to connect with a younger audience. It simply uses them effectively and without being too in your face to advance the plot, and add to the characters. Emphasising the world that they live in, and perhaps a near accurate, if occasionally intentionally exaggerated, depiction of 21st Century relationships with technology and what it can help, and allow, us to do. It simply adds to the cartoonish nature that the film embraces to allow the engaging ‘weirdness’ of the central figures to show. They’re enjoyable characters and it’s easy to form a connection with them as they emit heart and humour that the creators heap into them, and the film as a whole. It comes across with ease in one of the most fresh, unique, genuine and original animations standing out from the standard Disney and Pixar fare.

The Mitchells Vs. The Machines is a film that wholeheartedly embraces the idea of family. Inventively celebrating all their possible weirdness and individuality in a creative, hilarious piece filled with heart, emotion and most of all laughs.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Black Bear – Review

Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 45 minutes, Director – Lawrence Michael Levine

A filmmaker (Aubrey Plaza) finds herself looking for inspiration for her latest project in two similar cabin settings from two different perspectives

Write about what you know – it’s a phrase that appears to have repercussions on Aubrey Plaza’s Allison twice over in writer-director Lawrence Michael Levine’s latest. We initially see her taking residence in a quiet cabin in the woods, with couple of creatives Gabe (Christopher Abbott) and Blair (Sarah Gadon). Their life appears to be relatively calm, a family on the way, until Allison’s arrival. She begins to gradually chip away into their relationship, seemingly with the intention of working further between the pair. Taking sides back and forth in lengthy conversations about modern gender roles and sexual politics. It helps form a sort of psychosexual drama with tensions growing between the three, particularly with the uncertain aims and intentions of Plaza’s central figure.

Thanks to the longer conversations that line the film and the gradual development of the ideas that it brings up, or perhaps Allison forms for inspiration, there are plenty of points where the play-like events feel as if they’re happening in real-time. It adds an extra layer to the proceedings and allows for the drama to have a greater impact as it feels like it could go in any direction at any time, unable to stop as everything happens in the moment that you’re simply sat there watching like an invisible observer in the same setting. It’s such feelings that also line the second half of the film where the roles switch.

Allison finds herself the real-life wife of director Gabe. Starring in a film seemingly based on the events of the first half of the film. Blair plays opposite her in what appears to be the fictional Allison role, the real Allison suspects that her rival is having an affair. She gets increasingly drunk and details filming. Going from a “really hard to read” figure in the first half to a highly emotional cocktail of frustration – her husband simply telling her that this is why she shouldn’t have been in the film in the first place. This meta spin that knocks something down to reveal a two-way mirror, with the audience looking through the window on the unsuspecting set of feuding characters, their anger growing and impact the film crew around them.


Over time, in each scenario, the characters begin to overflow and break down. How they release their raging emotions differs, sometimes it’s sexually, others tears; often it’s through raising their voices to shout everyone else down. There are conflicting egos, some of which are presumed, warring throughout, growing as the battles continue and grow into a larger scale, and it’s certainly interesting to see it all play out. Plaza is in a very different role to what we’ve seen her play before. Steps away from her more comedic roles, and distant from the stalking psychosis of the title character in Ingrid Goes West (still her best role, although this comes close).

The rest of the cast also find themselves delivering good dual performances. The differences are clearly there, a handful are fairly subtle yet have a big impact on the shifts in style. Yet, although the characters change the tone and style remains consistent. This is a film that focuses on character and emotion, reaction instead of complete development. It makes for something compelling and detailed. Once you get used to the style and the course that appears to be taking, which after the first few minutes becomes clearer, especially as the limited selection of figures start to properly interact. From there the conflicting personalities, viewpoints, interactions, thoughts and depictions all boil over to create a highly dramatic representation of two different searches for inspiration amongst two very different creative mindsets.

After having space to lay itself out Black Bears picks up the pace with an effective play-like examination of character and response within a psychosexual search for creative inspiration and expressions.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Love And Monsters – Review

Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 50 minutes, Director – Michael Matthews

Daring to leave the safety of his bunker, Joel (Dylan O’Brien) dares to travel the giant-monster covered surface of the Earth to make the seven day journey to his girlfriend, Aimee (Jessica Henwick).

For a light adventure-comedy there’s plenty within Love And Monsters that’s likely to unsettle you. Mostly in the detail of the CGI monsters (the film itself was nominated in the Best Visual Effects category at this year’s Oscars), the likes of 15-20ft frogs towering over central figure Joel (Dylan O’Brien) are at times genuinely uncomfortable. It enhances the feeling of danger and the threat that they pose. The reason for the fact that frogs, worms, crabs and many other creatures and insects have grown into giant man-eating monsters is because of a meteor that humanity decided to, of course, fire rockets at to avoid destruction to the Earth. After radiation was emitted from the meteor and transforming all kinds of animals humans are no longer at the top of the food chain. Skip forward a few years and only 5% of the population remain, with most survivors living in small family-like bunker communities.

Joel appears to be the outsider in his colony. Not the strongest fighter, he’s the only single person left – and especially the youngest of the group. When monsters manage to breach their way into the bunker he freezes in panic, only just saved by the close friends around him. Thus, deciding that enough is enough, Joel braves the surface of the Earth, taking the challenge of the seven day journey to his girlfriend Aimee’s (Jessica Henwick) colony, having only talked to her via weak radio links for the past couple of years.

O’Brien makes for a charming lead and seems to perfectly capture the tone and style of the film. One that, not just because of the creatures he encounters, almost feels like an animated film in live-action format. Partly to do with the jokes that run throughout, none of which feel in-your-face or as if they’re shouting at you; simply naturally coming from the characters and then moving on in an equally effortless way, but also the general look and feel of the action that lies throughout. This isn’t to say that the piece doesn’t work in a live-action format, it certainly does, it simply feels as if it shares elements and details with some of the standard elements that we’ve become used to seeing in a handful of animated films of recent years. It works as a successful family (a handful of sex references, landing this a 12 rating from the BBFC, aside – perhaps one for the older kids, however, or those where the details might skim over their heads?) film, and a delightful surprise too, much as The Kid Who Would Be King was a couple of years ago.


Having gone in knowing absolutely nothing about the film what I discovered was a real treat. Consistently funny, and even with some occasional beats of effective emotion, it’s a film as much about community as it is about Joel’s journey as a whole. He meets, and parts with, various figures along the way. Including surface-living survivors Clyde (Michael Rooker) and Minnow (Ariana Greenblatt). Both figures are a joy to watch as they bounce off each other with ease and create flowing, engaging and entertaining conversation with their knowledge about all kinds of monsters that might lurk in whatever surroundings and how to effectively take them down – as Joel stumbles behind with a makeshift crossbow and newfound dog, which he’s called Boy. Each conversation feels finely put together and simply adds to the entertainment factor of the film and just how enjoyable it is.

When it all comes together there’s a lot to like within Love And Monsters. The simplistic style and effective execution are the type we don’t tend to see that often nowadays. Even some of the more conventional moments don’t get in the way of the pacing and don’t allow things to feel tired or unenjoyable due to lack of originality – an issue which doesn’t overly appear to be present here. Throw into the mix a charming lead and a number of engaging characters who feel naturally funny and real within the cartoon-like world of the film and it’s difficult not to be caught up within it and taken along for a consistently delightful time.

At times feeling like an animated film in live-action form Love And Monsters isn’t without it’s unsettling creatures and emotional beats. It’s a pleasantly surprising, not to mention effortlessly funny, treat that came from nowhere.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Oscar Predictions 2021

This year’s Academy Awards are possibly the most unpredictable in years. While we’re used to a surprise or two in each ceremony this year could be like no other.

In the constantly changing landscape of Academy votership and nominees this year has produced a diverse range of nominees unlike any other. The race seems to be exceptionally close in a number of categories, making it even more difficult to try and predict the winners. However, that’s still what I’m going to try and do here, with likely unsuccessful results.

Best Cinematography – Nomadland
Nomadland looks stunning and really stands out from the rest of the crowd here. It’s the kind of truly visual film that voters tend to swing for, one of the major talking points has been around the way the film looks. It also stands out amongst the other nominees. While Mank could rival it, it feels as if this is Nomadland’s prize.

Best Costume Design – Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom
Emma appears to be the strongest competitor here. However, Ma Rainey’s style appears to have been attracting voters in multiple ceremonies this awards season. In a number of anonymous voter articles in the last week or two (which, admittedly only show around ten voters in a 9,000+ member group) this appears to have been the favourite. Plus, there are some truly smashing suits on display.

Best Makeup And Hairstyling – Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom
For much the same reason as the predicted Costume Design win, Ma Rainey stands out as the frontrunner in this category. Other nominees have either potentially not stuck out as much or perhaps don’t seem to have as much that grabs the eye in terms of hair and make-up (Hillbilly Elegy, for example, was talked about, but not always in the best light at times, aside from Glenn Close’s transformation). Mank is perhaps the biggest competition, but this still feels fairly locked in for Ma Rainey.

Best Production Design – Mank
It appears that most technical category predictions amongst various sources appear to be fairly consistent, and for many confidently locked in. The Father’s subtle details and changes could well connect with a number of voters, however Mank’s film studio and production sets have plenty of sometimes larger-scale detail that could very well be recognised by voters. This could be the only win that the film with the most nominations this year wins, but it would certainly be understandable a win in this category.

Best Sound – Sound Of Metal
Unsurprisingly, sound is of great importance to Sound Of Metal. It’s an integral element to the story and the connection that we form with the central character. It feels like a lot of detail has gone into the design and impact of the sound in the film and it certainly lands by placing the viewer in his ears. It stands out from the standard musical or explosive war film nominees, and with its various elements could likely be a winner in this category.

Best Visual Effects – Tenet
It’s the major blockbuster with plenty of in-camera practical effects that appear to have attracted voters over the past few years over the likes of CGI-filled features. Tenet may not have picked up many nominations (two in total, the other for Production Design), but this one seems like a win because of the scale of the film and the way the visual effects add to that.

Best Original Song – Speak Now from One Night In Miami…
While I would love to see Husavik win this the apparent favour appears to be Leslie Odom Jr. (also nominated for Supporting Actor for his role in this film) and Sam Ashworth’s Speak Now. It seems to be the favourite to win in a category where for a number of people no major song has stuck out as a potential winner. This could be one of the most unpredictable, or rather closest, races of the night and I’m perfectly prepared to be proved wrong in this scenario. However, the song does appear to be the one that the Academy may lean towards most – although wouldn’t it be great if what some think is a slightly jokey song like Husavik won?

Best Original Score – Soul
It feels as if either way Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are winning this award – just with Soul Jon Batiste also gets one. While their Mank score is said to be a strong contender it’s hard to see this award going to anything but Soul. The way the music works with the film in it’s various different styles and elements, and the general descriptive nature of it, perhaps gives it a step above other nominees. Add to that the score’s win at various other ceremonies this awards season and the just how well the score works with the film and it seems like a strong contender for this award.

Best Film Editing – The Trial Of The Chicago 7
I’m strongly conflicted on this one. Many appear to claim that Sound Of Metal could take the win in the Film Editing category. It might not seem the obvious winner but there appears to be a lot of love surrounding it. However, in my view, the ‘flashier’ montage editing of The Trial of The Chicago 7 is perhaps what the Academy will lean towards – especially after the past couple of years with the likes of Bohemian Rhapsody and Ford V Ferrari taking the golden statuettes in this category. This is another category where I’m very ready to be wrong and for something else to take the award; it feels as if any of the nominees could take it, but I think The Trial Of The Chicago 7’s montages might just edge it over with the most votes.

Best Documentary Short – A Love Song For Latasha
The majority of nominees in this category appear to be somewhat heavy this year. While A Concerto Is A Conversation is perhaps the lightest it appears that there’s a lot of attention towards A Love Song For Latasha. There’s a chance that a number of voters had seen this prior to the nominations because of the short’s availability on Netflix.

Best Live-Action Short – Two Distant Strangers
This is perhaps the closest race of this year’s short categories. Feeling Through is said to be a strong contender and The Letter Room has the star power of Oscar Isaac behind it, perhaps a drawing point for some voters, making this the short that gained more attention from them due to the recognition. However, with themes that echo and reflect events from the past year it feels as if Two Distant Strangers could have a bigger impact on voters. Add to that, again, the fact that it’s on Netflix there appears to be a big push behind this particular short, alongside the simple matter of it being one of the favourites to win.

Best Animated Short – If Anything Happens I Love You
While Pixar is nominated for their short Burrow the Animated Short category, unlike Animated Feature, isn’t often lead by or reserved for Disney and Pixar. If Anything Happens I Love You made a big impact when it was first released on Netflix and got a lot of people talking, it’s perhaps the biggest name amongst the nominees. Alongside the subject matter potentially having emotionally hit a number of voters this appears to be the frontrunner, unless Burrow does manage to take this one.

Best Documentary Feature – My Octopus Teacher
There seems to be three potential winners in this category. My Octopus Teacher, Time and Collective. For weeks and weeks I thought that this was going to be Time’s award, however over the last week or two that appears to have changed. My Octopus Teacher seems to be the favourite to win, and has won a number of awards in documentary categories across the awards circuit this year. I haven’t seen the film and so I can’t speak on its chances with a great deal of confidence. However, based on previous wins, word of mouth around it and the general response it appears that this will likely be the winner at this year’s ceremony.

Best International Feature – Another Round
With it’s Best Director nomination Another Round is the favourite to win in this year’s International Feature category. Understandable too, because it’s a great film. While there is competition from Quo Vadis, Aida? and Collective this still seems to be the frontrunner. It’s perhaps the most recognisable name in the category, has had a generally strong, positive response and with the talk that if it was pushed more it could have had an appearance in other categories (including Leading Actor for Mads Mikkelson) Another Round seems like a possible winner in a category where votes could be evenly spread.

Best Animated Feature – Soul
It’s Pixar. It’s Pixar handling different themes and ideas for kids as to those for adults. Wolfwalkers seems to be the main competition, and it would be wonderful to see Cartoon Saloon pick up an Oscar, yet Soul seems to be the fixed-on highlighted nominee that’s very likely to pick up the win, especially with the emotional hit that a number of viewers have taken from it. The fact that it appears in other categories (even if technical ones, and could well win Best Score) there’s perhaps a bit more push behind it there too. Either way it would be an unsurprising 11th win of the Best Animated Feature for Pixar.

Best Original Screenplay – The Trial Of The Chicago 7
This is very, very close between The Trial Of The Chicago 7 and Promising Young Woman. Promising Young Woman appears to be the favourite to win, and there are plenty of elements within there that are understandable as to why. However, while it has slightly lost steam The Trial Of The Chicago 7 is an Aaron Sorkin courtroom drama, and I think that that could sway some, especially older, voters. Promising Young Woman could very well have its vote split by some of the other nominees in this category, such as Sound Of Metal and Minari. Perhaps both films could split votes with potential underdog Judas And The Black Messiah. However, in this case, with all the elements that it has and the strength of the screenplay I think that The Trial Of The Chicago 7 could well find itself winning this award. This is, clearly, another category where I’m very ready to be proven wrong. Promising Young Woman could easily win, and Judas And The Black Messiah could be a surprise win, there seems to be a fair deal of quiet support for it in this category. However, I’m going to stick with The Trial Of The Chicago 7, mostly for the thought of older voters leaning towards an Aaron Sorkin written courtroom drama.

Best Adapted Screenplay – The Father
Nomadland is a strong contender here, however some of the film was notably natural and slightly improvised, which may impact some voters – as will likely be the case with Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm, despite the fact that scenes are heavily scripted with presumed responses from unsuspecting participants and various scenarios worked around. However, the main thing that perhaps gives The Father a, very slight, edge is the emotional impact that it has; especially with the small details and changes that are in the otherwise naturalistic nature of the piece. It’s managed to pick up some screenplay awards so far and while initially a seemingly quiet outside contender it’s built up a fair deal of steam and attention since the nominations were announced and could easily get love in this category where it particularly seems to stand out amongst the other nominees. Again, Nomadland could be an alternative winner here, certainly not an “upset” as some might put it, but The Father could perhaps win here thanks to the more notable screenplay.

Best Supporting Actor – Daniel Kaluuya in Judas And The Black Messiah
Kaluuya has, deservedly, won a number of awards this season for this particular performance, and don’t expect that to stop. He’s the frontrunner in this category and it’s unlikely that co-star LaKeith Stanfield is going to split the vote in any way. Paul Raci was initially said to be competition, and at one point the frontrunner, here for his role in Sound Of Metal. If anything the new ‘upset’ is believed by some to be Sacha Baron Cohen in The Trial Of The Chicago 7, as a stand out in an ensemble cast there is reason to believe he has a chance in this respect. But, as the conversation around Raci appears to have died down that around Kaluuya has simply increased to the level that he seems very likely to win.

Best Supporting Actress – Yuh-Jung Youn in Minari
It seems that Glenn Close is unlikely to win for her eighth nomination, simply because the film she’s nominated for is the poorly-responded to Hillbilly Elegy. Maria Bakalova has been praised for being a relative newcomer and managing to match, and shine next to, Sacha Baron Cohen in Borat: Subsequent Moviefilm, and she poses a potential threat to Yuh-Jung Youn’s wonderful performance in Minari. There’s been increasing love and attention towards Youn, who potentially has the advantage of being in a more dramatic role as opposed to Bakalova’s comedic role – the Oscars still seem to somewhat lean away from comedy, even if Bakalova was once the favourite to win (and still has a fairly strong backing), until Youn won a number of prominent awards including at the SAG awards and BAFTAs.

Best Leading Actor – Anthony Hopkins in The Father
A lot of me still thinks that this is easily Chadwick Boseman’s to win for Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom. Hopkins won the BAFTA, although on home territory. He does seem to be the main competition to Boseman’s final film role, and favour appears to have grown towards him alongside the film he stars in. It’s a brilliant performance that could gain him the win, and while Riz Ahmed also seems to have a strong following behind him, although perhaps not as much matched to Boseman and Hopkins. I have a strong feeling that Boseman is still going to win this, deservingly so, and yet my mind tells me Hopkins, and so for some reason I’ve gone with his performance as my prediction. I’m very likely wrong, and even think that I am (I understand that this means my prediction makes absolutely no sense whatsoever), but, I still think there’s the chance of a surprise win for him here, and therefore place him as my prediction for Best Leading Actor. It could go either way.

Best Leading Actress – Carey Mulligan in Promising Young Woman
In this category it’s anyone’s race. Any of the nominees could take this home and there would likely be no fuss. While Vanessa Kirby seems to be the outsider for her brilliant performance in Pieces Of A Woman the other nominees could cancel each other out and lead her to a win. Meanwhile the other nominees have won awards at other ceremonies and made for one of the most unpredictable races of the night. There’s discussion around Frances McDormand having won twice in the past, and only three years ago for her role in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri and therefore being passed on for this so someone else can have a turn. And while Viola Davis won four years ago for her role in Fences she still seems to be a strong contender, Andra Day (my personal favourite in this category) has some support, although potentially not as much as other nominees, just pushing her outside the competition. Thus meaning we’re left with a race between Carey Mulligan’s fierce contemporary performance in Promising Young Woman and Viola Davis’ acclaimed turn in Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom. Either performer could take this award with ease (as, as already mentioned, could any of the nominees in this category), but I feel that somehow Mulligan could just get enough votes to push her to the win in this case. As stated already with a number of explanations in categories, essentially proving that I’m far from confident with most of these predictions and endlessly repeating myself, I’m very open to being proved wrong here and the Academy awarding to someone completely different. To, once again, repeat myself; this is an unpredictable race in an unpredictable year.

Best Director – Chloé Zhao for Nomadland
After winning almost every possible directing award under the sun this awards season it almost seems certain that Chloé Zhao will win this year’s Best Director award – becoming only the second woman to win the award (after Kathryn Bigelow’s win in 2010 for The Hurt Locker). David Fincher has been the potential ‘upset’ in this category, with most of the other nominees seemingly not having been overly discussed (aside from Thomas Vinterberg for Another Round who does appear to have had some support behind him). Yet, this still feels like Zhao’s award. With all the praise that she’s deservingly received not just during this awards season but since the initial festival screenings of the film, especially in regards to her style and the subtle techniques she uses to quietly and calmly capture the film. Her direction has been heavily discussed in what seems like nothing but good light from people all across the Academy, and film world in general. It seems difficult to imagine anyone but her winning this award, and deservingly so.

Best Picture – Nomadland
With all the love that it’s had I can see Nomadland being the film that most consistently makes the top spots on preferential ballots – especially within the top three. Minari could very easily be a surprise win, although a very good surprise, with it’s universality and how well it appears to have gone down with audiences. Although with how well it’s done at other ceremonies, and Chloé Zhao’s likely Best Director win, it’s hard to see Nomadland not winning Best Picture. But, with the strength of the other nominees and the unpredictable year that this is likely to be, I expect there will be a number of surprises during this year’s ceremony, it feels as if almost any of the nominees could win Best Picture (although maybe not Mank). Despite this, I’m going to say that Nomadland will win Best Picture, with Minari as a potential surprise winner

You can read my annual What Will Win Best Picture piece, delving into the chances of each of the nominees, here.