Downton Abbey: A New Era – Review

Cert – PG, Run-time – 2 hours 5 minutes, Director – Simon Curtis

While Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) and the staff oversee a film shoot at Downton Abbey many of the other faces and residents travel to the south of France, to a villa mysteriously left to Dowager Countess Violet (Maggie Smith).

With such an extensive range of characters, both within and out of the wealthy Grantham/ Crawley family, you would expect a film adaptation of Downton Abbey to have a lot to cover within various different strands. However, when the first feature adaptation of the hit television series was released in 2019 it turned out to tell the story of the house preparing for the king and queen to come and stay generally rather well. At least that’s what it was for those who have never seen the series before. For those who had there were a great many elements to dive into and keep track of continuing from the show. Legacies, hidden romances, a secret gay relationship, marriages, illnesses and so much more. Meanwhile, the sequel feels both much lighter and somehow busier. While many of the staff in this apparent new era – it’s noted by Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) that the house wants to “enter the 1930s with out heads held high” – are dealing with a film shoot occurring within Downton, many of the key faces and residents are sailing down to the sunny landscapes of the south of France, to a villa mysteriously bequeathed to Dowager Countess Violet (Maggie Smith – the straight and sarcastic humorous highlight of the film) from a gentleman she had a one week romance with in the 1860s.

Certainly the latter element is along the lines of the more general British small-to-big screen adaptation in sending the characters on holiday, it also has the bigger displays of wealth and stiff-upper-lip manners that you would expect from a period drama such as this. Yet, there’s a fair deal of build up to get to this point, and indeed the filming. With so many characters there’s plenty of jumping back and forth from scene to scene of brief conversations in grand halls and stairwells. It’s frustrating that you can almost see and hear the joins between each scene, the director shouting ‘action’ and ‘cut’ at the start and end of each take as you can pretty much see the start and end of each scene, with very little to bridge them together. It all revolves around potential build up to the core two strands of the film, both generally unrelated, although this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, yet provides little to hook you in due to the somewhat lacklustre construction.


However, as the cameras start rolling in the Abbey and film stars begin to show up – primarily Dominic West’s Guy Dexter and Laura Haddock’s Myrna Dalgleish – things begin to properly move along. The production of The Gambler is halted, however, when the true threat of the talkies on the silent film industry is revealed. The sweeping effect of sound in film, which causes great agitation to director Jack Barber (Hugh Dancy), is certainly dealt with with a fair deal of obviousness and heavy-handedness, but, as with before, once the apparent build-up of another idea is out the way and production shifts to involve sound there’s some interest and engaging enough moments created in the narrative to somewhat bring you in. Certainly nothing overly challenging is produced, as is likely expected from a product such as Downton where half the film involves a number of characters having gone on ‘holiday’ to investigate the matriarch’s “mysterious past”. The revelations and conversations are somewhat thin, but do just about enough to move things along.

Much of this comes before the second half where amongst the progressions of the two core strands more is introduced. More to do with hidden relationships and returning loves, quiet illnesses, etc. Most of this content appears to be for those who have followed the series, especially when it becomes dominant in the lengthy final half hour of the film, where it feels like things are constantly coming to a close before something else needs to be wrapped up. It’s likely that this moment will appeal and engage the original TV audience more, especially with the followed threads being more in their knowledge, perhaps. Whereas for those coming to this afresh, or even just based off of the first film, it may likely seem quite drawn out, although there are still some amusing and engaging moments throughout to keep interest held – and things don’t quite dive back into the stop-start nature of the opening stages.

The overall feel of this apparent new era of Downton Abbey is that while the opening and closing stages lead to the 2 hour plus run-time being felt – although the closing stages do have more to be amused by – the mid-section helps it along with enough content and lightness to carry things through. It might not be the tightest of films, but thanks to some of the chuckles along the way, and a handful of points of interest to keep you engaged once things properly kick off this half-return to Downton is serviceable viewing for those who have never seen an episode of the series, and for the fans a likely enjoyable (seeming) conclusion.

The start and end may be somewhat drawn out, the latter to wrap up loose ends and bring a likely enjoyable conclusion for fans, but within the two core strands of Downton Abbey: A New Era there’s enough to like and be amused by to lightly pass the time well enough before things begin to get slightly overstuffed.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Anima – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 2 minutes, Director – Liliya Timirzyanova

Conductor Anna (Alina Korol) leaves her life to live alone in the quiet of the forest, however when chorister Aglaya (Elizaveta Shakira) arrives to convince her to return the two begin to form an almost silent relationship.

Anima is one of those films which is difficult to review, or even properly talk about, partly due to the fact that it’s difficult to know where to start when discussing it, and from there what to properly say about its details and elements. Perhaps this is because for much of the film it’s hard to understand what’s actually going on, or what’s trying to be said. However, the best place to start is likely at the beginning where the most coherent content lies. For the most part we follow choir conductor Anna (Alina Korol) who suddenly leaves her life as it is to live along in the quiet of the forest. We see her contemplatively staring at the sea before retreating amongst the leaves, trees and bushes. However, it appears that the choir cannot cope without her guidance, as is slightly glimpsed at as she begins to fade away from them in the opening few minutes, when chorister Aglaya (Elizaveta Shakira) finds her and asks her to return.

From this point on the film gradually begins to unravel something of a relationship between the two. Amongst the silence of their surroundings, and indeed Anna who says very little over the course of the piece, there’s something of a meditative connection formed between the two as they begin to spend their lives together. The film appears to want to say that time is slowing down for them, they may even be in an entirely different realm away from the rest of the world. Everything could very well be a metaphor. A metaphor within a metaphor. Metaphors layered on top of other metaphors to make a metaphor sandwich. Or perhaps everything is rolled up to create one giant metaphor. As the film engages this course and begins to travel down it it moves further away from the viewer as it’s increasingly difficult to understand just what’s going on, or what the film is trying to be or say.


The core point appears to be about life and death, particularly during some of the longer shots which observe the two characters going about their basic tasks, such as eating at opposite sides of a wide shot. The structure moves away from something with narrative leanings to more a collection of shots, moments and ideas. Beats with little to connect to, alongside little clue given as to what’s actually happening at any point. Rarely is there a chance to try and engage with the film after a certain point as it simply carries along it’s path with little coherence or glimmer of referencing back to a core sense of communication between the pair. Things simply happen, or rather don’t, as they go about their lack of business in the forest.

It’s a saving grace therefore that the film itself is only 62 minutes. While the opening stages are used fairly well with the initial points raised they only act as a depiction of ‘before the forest’ for the two characters, particularly Anna. While the early stages in the wilderness do have some mild levels of interest things soon slip away into the realms of metaphors, shots and ideas. Linked together with little to interest the viewer or keep them in the piece. You simply remain watching in deep confusion as to what everything is actually meant to mean.

Anima’s initial set-up is soon abandoned as the silent relationship of the two central characters becomes a selection of brief shots, moments and ideas. All of which feel like some form of metaphor which you can never quite get your head around in the eventually lengthy 62 minute run-time.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Silent River – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 2 hours 1 minute, Director – Chris Chan Lee

While attempting to reconcile with his wife, Elliot (West Liang) meets mysterious figure Greta (Amy Tsang), who looks exactly like his wife and appears to be hiding something, in a desert motel.

There’s much within the opening expositional shots of writer-director Chris Chan Lee’s Silent River which sets in a feeling of entrapment. The opening long-shot tracking initial central figure Elliot (West Liang) as he drives through open, desert plains occasionally gazes at the sky. A sky which looks almost like a painting, as if Elliot is stuck in one, under someone else’s view and control. It matches up with the isolation of the motel room in which he starts to stay in while attempting to reconnect with his estranged wife over the phone – long shots show the area from each corner and further provide the feeling of being watched. It’s part of a slow build-up, settling in the idea that there’s perhaps a threat within the environment keeping the central figure in place, a thought which is expanded upon as we’re introduced to Greta (Amy Tsang), a mysterious woman who appears to look exactly like Elliot’s wife and alongside that seems to be hiding something.

As Elliot begins to try to learn more about Greta and what she might be hiding Lee’s film echoes vibes of David Robert Mitchell’s Under The Silver Lake. Layers of mystery and ambiguity are created as various other genres are introduced and played around with, particularly those of a sci-fi and horror nature. The horror itself, particularly in lengthier sequences, may not always click, it’s generally quite hit or miss, however as the slight sci-fi nature is expanding it helps to push the mystery and level of intrigue the viewer has in the world that’s being established within the confines of the motel. While playing around with these various different tones and ideas Lee generally manages to keep a good balance throughout the film to help keep the audience engaged, and certainly not go overboard with anything – providing a consistent level of interest and intrigue in the unfolding revelations and events.


Most of these arrive in the second half of the film, where things are switched from ambiguity to a more direct narrative and set of events. This is also when the central figure appears to change from Elliot to Greta – making it easier to reveal various points and elements. An element of mystery remains within the piece, but one which is translated into threat within the futuristic aspects that are presented. It works within the slightly different flow and style of the second half, which manages to provide answers and progress the narrative further in a different way without feeling like a different film. It’s handled well and helps to keep you engaged within the unfolding strands and twists which are displayed within the obscurities and genres that make up the film.

Perhaps things don’t quite hold up in the final slow-mo infused stages, where things feel slight tangential compared to everything that has come beforehand. Alongside somewhat calling back to the opening stages, with things feeling somewhat uneven, although, luckily, the film avoids feeling as if it crashes into itself. There’s still a watchable and interesting nature to it, however it feels clear that the strengths lie within the central 80-90 minutes of the piece rather than the opening and closing 15-20 – where things are either being brought in and established or brought back to wrap up. But, luckily there’s plenty of mystery within the film and its well-balanced mixture of tones and genres. You can certainly tell its handful of inspirations, while never feeling that it gets bogged down by trying to reference or call back to them – successfully relying on its own narrative strengths and mysteries instead. Creating an interesting sense of ambiguity throughout to heighten the genre tones and drama at play within the confines of the limited setting.

While the opening and closing stages might feel slightly detached from the rest of the film, the majority of Silent River is a well-executed blend of genres which mix together to create a fine sense of ambiguity before a more direct narrative shift, largely in the vein of the likes of Under The Silver Lake.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: Pink Opaque – Review

Release Date – Available now, Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 30 minutes, Director – Derrick Perry

A struggling Los Angeles film student (Elijah Boothe) attempts to put together his final project while charting a growing romantic relationship and connecting with his career-fading uncle (Chaim Dunbar).

There’s much of within co-writer (alongside Dave Ragsdale) and director Derrick Perry’s Pink Opaque which is concerned with its characters trying to prove themselves in some form or another. Central figure Travis (Elijah Boothe) is a struggling film student, attempting to put together his final film to little positive response from his professor, who picks apart many of the details which he is presented with. There’s a risk that Travis’ project won’t even be screened as part of the upcoming college showcase. Yet, despite the odds, he’s determined to not join “the rest of the people with a meaningless degree to give meaningless answers to meaningless questions”. He needs to find inspiration for his short, to give it an identity, and alongside that he needs money – turning to his somewhat distant uncle, Robin (Chaim Dunbar) for financial help.

Robin too is looking for inspiration to keep himself relevant as a television producer, his career having begun to fade as he ages and moves away from what’s currently trending. He hopes that his nephew will somehow be able to have an idea which can launch him back to success. Yet, his nephew is juggling more than just his short and financial worries as his relationship with girlfriend Kristen (Ruby Park) grows, despite the strong objections of her older brother (Daniel C.). Much like Travis the film is trying to balance a number of different elements and aspects in such a short amount of time. It results in a feeling that what we’re seeing is a selection of patches of ideas and moments before moving on to the next point or character, instead of a properly overarching narrative.


With so much going on for each of the different characters, and so much of it kept separate up until the final stages – when even then things don’t quite gel together – it’s difficult to connect with the film or anyone in it with so much jumping going on. It simply leads to a distance being created between the viewer and the film as there’s no real time for a hook to be formed with each element and figure. The personal dramas don’t have the strength or development to properly connect with you and bring you in meaning that you simply sit watching a slight jumble of bits and ideas, changing perspectives and moments which never quite have enough to grab you or simply bring you in to the piece as a whole.

As elements do begin to come together the dramatic impact simply isn’t there, particularly in the attempted escalations of the final 20 minutes. There’s been little to draw you in up until this point, yet it feels that even the mesh of everything having finally come together still has little effect overall. You simply remain watching what happens with little to react to or engage with due to the overstuffed and jumpy nature of everything that has come beforehand. Perhaps if it were dealing with less perspectives then there may be a feeling of more narrative and better flow to the piece as a whole.

By juggling the different ideas and perspectives characters in such a short amount of time Pink Opaque ends up feeling like more a selection of moments than a flowing structure, leading to a feeling of distance between the viewer.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Casablanca Beats – Review

Release Date – 29th April 2022, Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 42 minutes, Director – Nabil Ayouch

Through the help of their teacher (Anas Basbousi), a group of teenagers at a cultural centre learn how to overcome the shackles of politics and tradition through the expression of hip-hop and rap.

Shortly after the idea enters the mind that Casablanca Beats has links to the likes of School Of Rock a poster for the film appears in the background, on the classroom wall. A wall filled with its fair share of colours, posters and graffiti – just some of the ways in which the teenage students are introduced to a safe space in which they can discuss and express themselves. It’s a box from the outside world where they learn about rap and hip-hop from their teacher Anas (Anas Basbousi) – perhaps a former rapper himself – using the music and lyrics which they create to express themselves and release their anger and stresses over the politics and traditions in their country through the attitude in their delivery.

While not quite a film that has the students standing on their desks reciting “O captain, my captain” the focus isn’t quite on the effects that Anas has, but more the effects that rap has, Anas acting as more of a catalyst and support. It comes across in the relatively plotless nature of the film, instead detailing the change and development experienced by the handful of teenagers in the class. The way in which they are impacted by the music and their lives change due to them trying to take more control and action – sometimes through the expression of rap itself, one key scene involves young teenager Nouhaila (Nouhaila Arif) pouring out her feelings through her rhymes to her controlling older brother. There’s a brief strand for each of the central figures, depicting their repressive home lives and what their own lyrics are fighting against. These don’t exactly create any form of narrative, although show an individual arc of sorts for each figure, and perhaps because of this there’s an occasionally disjointed nature to the piece with its scene-by-scene nature.


Yet, all comes together in full-class debates and conversations regarding politics and beliefs. Thoughts and opinions flying around the room in extended sequences. While some feel a bit lengthy, the film itself gets out just before it feels like it may go on for a bit too long, there’s still enough interest in what’s being discussed to keep you engaged in the moment. Perhaps the most interesting point is that such conversations are being held in what feels like a fairly family-friendly film (albeit one with a couple of f-bombs). The BBFC 12 rating is certainly justified, but there still feels like a relatively universal (maybe not quite for the younger kids, though) feel to director Nabil Ayouch’s film, and his screenplay co-written with Maryam Touzani, once again bringing about that School Of Rock connection. It helps to further bring to life what the students are facing, and to some extent Anas as he tries to fight against parents perceptions of what he is teaching – and at times the heads of the arts centre he is teaching at.

Things come together to create an interesting and engaging film that works because of the way it focus on the effect of rap on the students over anything else. Showing them opening up and beginning to attempt to take more control of their own lives amidst the restrictions of their families and country’s traditions. While the occasional glimpses into these separate family lives does create something of a slightly disjointed feel to the film there’s still plenty to like, and a slight connection formed with the figures on screen – even if not quite on an individual level. Things move along rather well and you’re generally well-engaged throughout with your interest in the development of the characters, shown in the conversations and debates which they engage in with increasing confidence – moving from the classroom to the streets to the potential of the stage. It works well in its vein, allowing the music and lyrics to speak for themselves and help move things along at the character’s pace, simply adding another layer to the nature of the development.

There’s an interesting nature to the School Of Rock-esque feel of Casablanca Beats, while allowing the rap to move and develop things within the scene-by-scene nature of the occasionally disjointed narrative. Holding your involvement and interest for the most part, particularly when it comes to the growth and change of the central class.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent – Review

Release Date – 22nd April 2022, Cert – 15, Run-time – 1 hour 47 minutes, Director – Tom Gormican

Considering retiring from acting Nicolas Cage (Nicolas Cage) is offered a million dollars to attend a wealthy fan’s birthday party, however when Javi (Pedro Pascal) is revealed to be the head of a major cartel Cage is recruited by the CIA to help take him down.

Over the years, after having been made into so many memes, Nicolas Cage has perhaps warped in the eyes of some into a meme himself. It would be so easy for The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent, where the actor plays himself, to be filled with references and jokes to his career, a self-aware film filled with memes, and yet it doesn’t. It almost feels as if the lead could be any actor playing themselves, or an actor playing a fictional actor. Yet, there’s something rather clever about the idea of Nick Cage playing Nick Cage, particularly within this film. Allowing for a celebration of both his career and him simply being him, while managing to provide a couple of gags along the way.

Here we find the fictional version of Cage considering retiring from acting, after a series of bad auditions and readings for parts. This all going against the wishes of a 90s version of himself, loud and highly energetic – donning a Wild At Heart t-shirt and a leather jacket – a figure which screams the famous appearance the actor made on Wogan where he backflipped in and kicked the air. He’s in serious debt to the hotel he’s been staying at and the thing that could make that all go away is the offer of one million dollars to attend the birthday party of a wealthy fan, Javi (Pedro Pascal – having a lot of fun playing a complete ‘silly character’). However, not long after arrival Cage discovers from CIA operatives Vivan (Tiffany Haddish) and Martin (Ike Barinholtz) that Javi is the head of a major cartel who have kidnapped the daughter of one of the candidates in the upcoming Catalonian presidential election in the hope of fixing it. Soon he’s recruited by the pair to both get answers and track down Maria (Katrin Vankova).


A series of good performances, particularly Cage who is great as the fictionalised version/s of himself, help to bring about much of the comedy throughout the piece. While slightly prodding at action film conventions there’s generally plenty straying away from such a nature which helps the overall piece along. Allowing it to not feel tired or reliant on both knowing Cage’s career (although also featuring enough for fans of the actor) or a completely self-aware nature. It’s certainly a respectful screenplay for the actor from co-writers Kevin Etten and Tom Gormican – the latter also taking on directing duties – where narrative is put as at much of a core focus as the lead star. While this narrative may feel somewhat crammed into the third act, due to the jokes and scenes of the budding friendship between Nick and Javi – which provides plenty of laughs and chuckles throughout as the core focus of many scenes – what comes before is undeniably entertaining and at least drops some build up to it instead of forcing everything all at once towards the end in the hope of forming some kind of last-minute arc.

Yet, what makes the film click is the way in which it looks at and discusses the central figure of Nicolas Cage. The career which he has had, and will have. He’s cleverly used and cast in the film, with a different actor this would be very different, this has, of course, been tailored to Cage but in such a specific way that still manages to avoid feeling cliché or obvious. It helps to bring you in to the various scenes and moments of this fictionalised version of him, trying to be better while coping with a career breakdown. There’s so much the screenplay could easily dive into and yet it manages to avoid it all by remaining direct with its narrative, the friendship at the centre of the piece, never overinflating Cage or his presence in the film – he is as much a player/ character in this film as everyone else – and making an entertaining piece of work with plenty of laughs throughout. And it works because it looks at Nicolas Cage instead of a potential comedic perception, making it all the better for having done that.

The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent works because it avoids a self-aware feel. Leaning into Nicolas Cage the actor instead of the meme. Cage is great in the leading role with a supporting cast who help bring about many of the laughs. The third act may feel somewhat busy, but there’s still plenty to enjoy throughout, especially within the central friendship.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Operation Mincemeat – Review

Cert – 12, Run-time – 2 hours 8 minutes, Director – John Madden

A team of British intelligence officers put together a false identity for a dead corpse with fake documents that they hope will divert the Nazis from their upcoming attack.

Perhaps one of the signs that a film such as Operation Mincemeat is working effectively is when it’s able to conjure up tension even though you know (or can generally presume) how things are going to happen. The Allies won World War II, this story is being told in the first place, you can assume that it succeeds. Yet, as the group are properly preparing their dead body to literally float into enemy hands, looking over the work that they have compiled and poured over the details of for months on end, there’s a sense of worry. What if things don’t go right? What if everything is returned without having been opened or looked at? ‘Everything’ in this case being a series of fake letters and documents written in the hope of distracting the Nazis to Greece instead of remaining in Sicily, where an attack will hopefully be launched.

The group behind this operation, having to meticulously create a false identity, relationship and series of exchanges to seem like the identity claimed to the corpse is real, is racing against the clock, and indeed a group who don’t see much in their plan. Led by Colin Firth’s Ewen Montagu and Matthew Macfadyen’s traditional, stiff-upper-lip Charles Cholmondeley the team behind Operation Mincemeat meet difficulties and obstructions within the fable that they weave. Not just when it comes to their core goal, with the presence of Kelly Macdonald’s Jean Leslie, typist turned key player in the effort, something of a slight love triangle forms between her and the two leads. It’s an idea that never really clicks or takes off the ground, feeling more at home with a selection of third act inclusions, or at least points in the latter half of the piece, where things are introduced with little time for further mention, or development. Feeling present to simply add to the worries and stresses certain characters face, not always properly connecting with the audience.


They stick out in a film that otherwise feels mostly focused on its core narrative of the Operation Mincemeat arc. There are occasional points for an underused Johnny Flynn’s Ian Fleming – whose screen-time largely revolves around the idea of him getting inspirations for his series of spy stories, a successful running gag involves it seeming as if everyone is currently working on a novel of some kind. The ensemble nature of the film, with a handful of British acting stars, does somewhat bring about the feeling of a standard British behind-closed-doors World War II drama, something which is present during a number of moments within the unfolding narrative. It mostly arrives in the second half as various twists and turns are explored late on, and Jason Isaacs Admiral Godfrey begins to play more of a part, although more in discussion than actually being seen.

With such points coming into play at this stage the film begins to show its run-time, although as it begins to come to a close. Perhaps this is pushed by the feeling that it wants to close at a handful of stages, and builds to what feels like an ending, but continues so that the whole story is told, as it needs to be. It forms a slightly jumbled feel to the third act, which while still relatively on track and engaging does carry a fair bit more weight than the rest of the film before it; where much of the references have simply been that, referenced points with not as much emphasis or push until now. Despite this late stage set of additions there’s still enough focus on the main unfolding operation to keep the audience engaged and interested in the way things pan out, particularly for those unaware of the events. It’s a good British war drama that generally keeps its flow throughout and is helped along by a set of good performances from the ensemble cast.

Slightly overstuffed towards the end Operation Mincemeat still keeps focus on its titular operation to keep the viewer engaged and interested within the well-acted events as the unfold over the course of the, slightly lengthy, run-time.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

The Northman – Review

Cert – 15, Run-time – 2 hours 17 minutes, Director – Robert Eggers

When his father, the king (Ethan Hawke), is killed by his uncle (Claes Bang) a Viking prince (Alexander Skarsgård) spends years vowing to track down the murderer to exact his revenge.

While it may not be in the horror vein, co-writer (alongside Icelandic novelist and poet Sjón) and director Robert Eggers conjures up just as much terrifying atmosphere within his latest, The Northman, as his two previous features, The Lighthouse and The Witch. It comes in the relentless noise of animalistic rituals, dances and battle cries. The camera crawls towards Alexander Skarsgård’s once-prince Amleth as he stomps and writhes and howls, releasing his inner wolf and the fury that comes with it. Screaming his pain and anger into the fire in front of him, harbouring years of rage towards his uncle (Claes Bang) for having killed his father, the king, (Ethan Hawke) and kidnapped his mother (Nicole Kidman). His stance and viewpoint has changed little since he managed to escape as a child (the younger Amleth played by Oscar Novak). The phrase throughout the trailers “I will avenge you father. I will save you mother. I will kill you Fjölnir” echoes across the film as Amleth tracks down Fjölnir, stowing away as a slave, and preparing to kill him.

As mentioned, the atmosphere flows thick throughout the course of the narrative. There are hints of Eggers’ fantastic debut The Witch when it comes to the lingering threats and tension at play as Amleth plays with his uncles mind, and attacks those in the small Icelandic clan he has formed, in the build up to killing him. Such feelings are mixed in with tones that feel reminiscent of The Revenant when it comes to the brutal attacks. Blood sprays, splutters, spurts and pours across the wet, cold and muddy landscapes showing anything but a clean battle. There’s no denying the gory nature of the film, adding to the intense feel on many occasions, and at times the fear factor that a handful of moments hold. The detail which helps bring you further into the world which Eggers, and his creative team, have so cinematically created. Add to that the roaring sound blared from the cinema speakers and you’re forced into plenty of the moments, up close and right in front of the characters as they attack and below with their vengeful fury.


This isn’t to say that the film is all brutality and shouting. There are plenty of quieter narrative based moments as Amleth builds up his plan, involving the slaves around him; including the young woman he begins to form a relationship with, Olga (Anya Taylor-Joy). On plenty of occasions what brings you in is the tactical execution of some of these plans, executed (sometimes in more ways than one) in the middle of the night while others are distracted. The camera tracks the characters almost like they’re in a spy thriller, yet never detracts from the dark drama that’s at play. One which knows how to use mythology and elements of folklore to progress and deepen the narrative while never allowing it to feel bogged down. Perhaps not led as much as his two previous features by such content there’s still plenty within The Northman to enhance a lingering sense of mysticism about the piece – and not just when relating to the idea of riding to Valhalla.

The night is often separated from the daylight, questioning whether certain elements are dreams or reality. What is a genuine foretelling and what is in Amleth’s mind, it comes in the almost black and white nature of his encounter with a seeress (Björk). The image isn’t completely in black and white, simply drained of colour, adding to the strange, otherworldly nature of the moment that while sticking out from the brutality of what surrounds it works perfectly in progressing the narrative and further heating up the central figure’s burning want for revenge. Aside from perhaps the final stages where the film begins to slightly show its run-time there’s plenty of consistency that keeps you in place for the duration of the film and allows for a work of true cinematic spectacle, that may even improve upon rewatches. Just make sure to see this big and loud, much like the impact of the film, for the true thundering effect that Robert Eggers and his team have conjured up. Perhaps not something of the mainstream, but for it to have been released to mainstream cinemas is just another item on the list for the boldness of The Northman.

Brutal, loud, gory, violent, intense, terrifying, cinematic; there’s plenty to love about the visual and audible atmosphere that runs throughout The Northman. It may slightly begin to show its run-time, but the elements remain intact throughout for an almighty roar of a Viking experience.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

The Lost City – Review

Cert – 12, Run-time – 1 hour 52 minutes, Directors – Aaron Nee, Adam Nee

When she finds herself kidnapped by a billionaire (Daniel Radcliffe), adventure-romance writer Loretta Sage (Sandra Bullock), alongside her cover model (Channing Tatum), finds herself exploring an island to find the treasure featured in her most recent book.

There have been plenty of comparisons made between The Lost City and the likes of Romancing The Stone and Jewel Of The Nile. The film certainly occasionally acts as a throwback to such adventure-romance flicks. But, while displaying such throwbacks it doesn’t ever feel stuck in the past. There are plenty of moments, not just when it comes to the tone and style of a handful of gags, that allow it to avoid delving into feeling dated or of another era. Perhaps some of this comes down to the casting of Sandra Bullock and Channing Tatum – particularly Tatum playing cover model Alan, a true himbo figure trying to prove himself as a worthy hero to the writer of the adventure-romance novels which he lends his face, and body, to the covers of.

That writer happens to be Bullock’s Loretta Sage. Since the passing of her husband five years prior her workflow has dwindled, and seemingly so has the quality. Her latest book, The Lost City Of D, has been met with lacklustre reviews in terms of both the adventure and the adventure shared between the two central figures throughout the novel. However, the book has captured the attention of billionaire Abigail Fairfax (Daniel Radcliffe) who has located the lost city and believes that Sage can help him to find the treasure at the centre of the novel, the crown of fire, based on the expertise she has shown from having written so much about it. Therefore Bullock, with Tatum attempting to come to the rescue, finds herself stranded on a strange island with little clue of how to escape; being forced to go on an adventure much like the ones she has written about for years – just without the “pages of coital reverie”.


The casting of Radcliffe as the traditional British villain certainly feels intentional and he definitely appears to understand the character and what the film wants him to be – his baffled delivery of the line “why are things exploding?” is one of the highlights of the film. Throw in a publicist (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) doing everything she can to reach her friend to get her back on track with her book tour and you have a handful of traditional figures for this kind of film. It appears that the writing team for The Lost City are very aware of this and have tried to craft something within a more traditional vein, again with some more modern jokes and references for the cast to deliver – helped by the various points of action which mix both slight parody, mostly in the form of Brad Pitt’s brief screen-time, and simple comedic action. A cast who all seem to be having fun making this film. And while the fun doesn’t always entirely come across it does help to lift the tone in a number of scenes and gives the film an overall breezier feel. While there may be some slight jumping from perspectives with characters in different places there’s not quite a sketch feel to the film, or one that’s overall too jumpy and constantly flicking back and forth, avoiding little time being given to follow what’s happening at one point or another.

Overall, there’s plenty to like throughout The Lost City, helping push it along and keep you engaged throughout the run-time. Although, perhaps the moments that work best are those simply allowing Bullock, Tatum and Radcliffe to have a good time in the flow of the adventure-chase narrative. Almost as soon as the villain appears on screen and takes the acclaimed author to the titular lost city on his private jet you know what you’re in for, and luckily the film keeps a consistent style and tone. Maintaining a slight throwback style while avoiding a dated feel there’s plenty to amuse and enjoy within the traditional arc that the film travels across. Perhaps not as thrilling as the supposed Lovemore and Dash adventures are made out to be in Sage’s books, but still entertaining nonetheless.

The cast of The Lost City are clearly having fun in the breezy flow of this adventure-romance, heightening the amusement factor to be found within the slightly updated comedic action and adventure notes.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

PIFF 2022: A Beautiful Curse – Review

Release Date – TBC, Cert – N/A, Run-time – 1 hour 32 minutes, Director – Martin Garde Abildgaard

Photographer Samuel (Mark Strepan) arrives on a mysterious island where everyone appears to be asleep, striking up a relationship with Stella (Olivia Vinall), the only person who seems to be awake and not monitoring those who are asleep.

There are plenty of questions raised throughout the short 92 minute course of A Beautiful Curse. Some are answered, but many are left with an ambiguous response, or almost nothing at all, at the end of the film. While some feel as if they do need an answer, particularly after having built up so much in the first half, there’s no denying the weird sense of mystery they create within the piece. As photographer Samuel (Mark Strepan) arrives on an island where time appears to have stopped, with everyone having fallen asleep where they stood or sat at that very moment, sirens blare with announcements that anyone still awake should leave immediately, and report to relevant authorities. Yet, there doesn’t seem to be any relevant authorities, aside from the menacing sight of those wearing hazmat suits, inspecting the tags around those who are asleep. They appear to be the only other people who are awake, until Samuel meets Stella (Olivia Vinall); a young woman around his age who he begins to strike up a relationship with, as they both try to survive and avoid the sleep curse that has plagued the rest of the island.

While containing a number of themes and elements which could so easily lean into the horror genre writer-director Martin Garde Abildgaard seems to lean away from such a feeling, instead focusing on the mystery and the questions that are raised. Even as he begins to shift away from the idea of the sleep curse and focuses on the growing relationship between Samuel and Stella there are a handful of questions raised, especially as the narrative appears to begin to jump back and forth in time. An element which, admittedly, does begin to get a bit much in the second half, but certainly manages to intensify the feeling of wondering what is real and what’s perhaps in the character’s minds.


You’re brought in through the conversations that they have, getting to know each other and exploring their strange surroundings – and, indeed, why they’re both present and still awake, to some extent. Strepan and Vinall give good performances which help to keep you engaged in the film particularly as it reaches some of its, perhaps, stranger moments which are generally pulled off thanks to the build up which has occurred beforehand. While the build up may sometimes switch and conflict focus depending on the state of the characters at that particular time, mostly in terms of the sleep curse and their relationship in either half of the narrative, it still manages to create that important sense of intriguing mystery which runs throughout most of the piece and often acts as the biggest hook of your interest and engagement.

The film seems to know this and plays around with just that in the way that it structures itself. The way it starts to potentially jump back and forth in time and still evolves the relationship between the two central figures. How they interact and behave around each other, and things change hinting at just how much might be real and how much may be imagined. Avoiding a horror feeling it simply creates that engaging sense of mystery which is largely carried throughout, even as the narrative slightly structures itself around you. While not every question is answered, perhaps one or two too many, that appears to be the intention and generally it works over the course of A Beautiful Curse which weaves an interesting, weird mystery into its setting and relationship.

While it may leave a handful too many questions open, the mystery within the relationship and sleep curse lines, switching focus between each half, holds your interest and generally keeps you engaged amongst the generally effectively unexplained weirdness of the setting.

Rating: 3 out of 5.